Quality of Work Life Among Faculty Members at Jerash University From Their Point of View

Abstract

Objectives: The study aims to identify the level of quality of work life among faculty members at Jerash University because it is important in motivating them to work in a good way and raising their motivation to work. The University competes with other Universities, so the majority of Universities in general and private universities in particular seek to attract the best academic cadres to create a university environment improve the educational environment, and increase the university’s productivity, as well as identify whether there is Statistically significant differences in the level of quality of work life among faculty members at Jerash University due to the variables: gender, academic rank, college, and experience in university teaching. Theoretical framework: This study focuses on the quality of work life among faculty members at Jerash University, Higher education institutions face enormous challenges and great competition between universities in general and private universities in particular. The concept of quality of work life is one of the modern concepts in the domain of management in general and in the domain of higher education institutions in particular and in light of the importance of educational institutions and their effective role in Developing the work and improving the performance of faculty members, which reflects positively on the student as a way out of the educational-learning process and competitiveness with other educational institutions. Method: Obtain survey data and use descriptive-analytical method and employing conceptual and analytical approach analysis of the literature articles and using a questionnaire as a tool for the study to collect data from a sample of (94) faculty members at Jerash University who were selected randomly Results: The results indicate that the level of quality of work life among faculty members at Jerash University from their point of view was moderate. There were no statistically significant differences in the degree of strategic leadership practice among academic leaders from the point of view of faculty members due to the variables of gender, academic rank, and experience. Conclusion: These results highlight the need for college leaders to diversify the methods of evaluating faculty members in the college. Training courses for academic leaders related to resolving conflicts and problems through scientific methods.