Abstract
This study explored the relationship between water fluoridation quality and development indicators at municipal level. In addition, fluoride concentrations found were classified based on two criteria for interpreting the samples. A cross-sectional ecological exploratory study was carried out including all municipalities of the metropolitan region of Great Vitória, ES, Brazil. From May to October 2016, 648 samples of water were collected covering water treatment plants responsible for more than 80% of the population of each municipality. The fluoride concentration of each sample was determined using ion-specific electrode and the results were classified according to the federal act and the criterion proposed by the Collaborating Center of the Brazilian Ministry of Health for Oral Health Surveillance. The outcome was the rate of values included in the optimal concentration interval and the independent variables were municipal-level indicators related to demographics, economics, sanitation, health conditions and human development characteristics. The Spearman test and Kappa statistic were used in the analysis. The percentage of samples presenting optimal fluoride concentration ranged from 68.1 to 81.4%, considering the two criteria used. The Kappa statistic between the criteria was 0.671 (p-value = 0.001). Human development, average coverage of supervised toothbrushing, and total population showed a strong positive correlation with the quality of fluoridation while infant mortality and tooth-extraction/dental procedures ratio showed a strong negative correlation. The plausibility of observed correlations encourages further investigations of potential causes.
Highlights
Fluoridation of public water supply is considered one of the ten most important public health measures of the 20th century (CDC, 1999)
This study explored the relationship between water fluoridation quality and development indicators at the municipal level
A total of 646 samples were analyzed from May to October 2016, because two samples were lost during the analysis process
Summary
Fluoridation of public water supply is considered one of the ten most important public health measures of the 20th century (CDC, 1999). In addition to reducing tooth-decay rates (rates of cavities), its low cost compared to the high social benefit reduces social inequality in the access to fluoride and can benefit all strata of the population according to the reach of the network of public utilities’ water supply (Kumar, 2008). Data from British Fluoridation Society showed that water fluoridation had reached about 370 million people worldwide around 2012. There are important within-country differences regarding access to water fluoridation. The residents in the least-developed least-populated areas do not have access to water fluoridation or the fluoride amount in drinking water is unknown (Gabardo et al, 2008; Peres et al, 2004)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Ambiente e Agua - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
