Quality of life in adolescents with narcolepsy type 1– a transversal study in a tertiary hospital

Abstract

Purpose– Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is a rare chronic sleep disorder, usually arising by adolescence that negatively impacts quality of life. It is characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), cataplexy, hypnagogic/hypnopompic hallucinations, sleep paralysis and sleep fragmentation. The goals of this work were to characterize NT1 adolescents regarding sleep characteristics, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and future life perspectives and later to compare this group with a control group of healthy adolescents (HA). Methods– Transversal descriptive/analytical study including NT1 patients followed in a sleep center of a tertiary hospital and 23 HA. Data were collected through an online survey, fulfilled by the participants, including four sections: demographics; questionnaire evaluating sleep and EDS; questionnaire evaluating HRQoL; inquiry regarding future perspectives. An extra section for the NT1 group only, comprising questions about the characterization of narcolepsy, was included. Results22 NT1 adolescents were included, with a median age of 15.0 years-old. Beyond EDS, all had presented cataplexy - 19 still reported it. Twenty patients took psychostimulants regularly for EDS, while 13 patients took venlafaxine or fluoxetine for cataplexy. Nineteen adolescents took regular naps and 19 maintained psychological appointments. Self-reported sleep quality was similar between groups (p = 0.112). EDS was identified in seven NT1 patients and none in the control group. HRQOL was significantly lower in NT1 patients only for the physical well-being domain (p = 0.001). Regarding future perspectives, results were similar, except for a lower probability of getting a driver's license in NT1 patients, despite no statistical significance (p = 0.104). DiscussionDaytime sleepiness is difficult to control in NT1, despite specialized treatment. HRQoL was similar between groups in all domains except for the physical well-being. Despite good adherence to pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments (namely psychological therapy) that account for these good results, the physical well-being domain is difficult to manage.