Treatment of central disorders of hypersomnolence: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline.

This systematic review provides supporting evidence for the accompanying clinical practice guideline on the treatment of central disorders of hypersomnolence in adults and children. The review focuses on prescription medications with U.S. Food & Drug Administration approval and nonpharmacologic interventions studied for the treatment of symptoms caused by central disorders of hypersomnolence. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine to perform a systematic review. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies addressing pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for central disorders of hypersomnolence were identified. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the clinical significance of all outcomes. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to assess the evidence for the purpose of making specific treatment recommendations. The literature search identified 678 studies; 144 met the inclusion criteria and 108 provided data suitable for statistical analyses. Evidence for the following interventions is presented: armodafinil, clarithromycin, clomipramine, dextroamphetamine, flumazenil, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG), light therapy, lithium, l-carnitine, liraglutide, methylphenidate, methylprednisolone, modafinil, naps, pitolisant, selegiline, sodium oxybate, solriamfetol, and triazolam. The task force provided a detailed summary of the evidence along with the quality of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations. Maski K, Trotti LM, Kotagal S, etal. Treatment of central disorders of hypersomnolence: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(9):1895-1945.

This systematic review provides supporting evidence for the accompanying clinical practice guideline on the referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) for surgical consultation. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine. A systematic review was conducted to identify studies that compared the use of upper airway sleep apnea surgery or bariatric surgery to no treatment as well as studies that reported on patient-important and physiologic outcomes pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the clinical significance of using surgery to treat obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to assess the evidence for making recommendations. The literature search resulted in 274 studies that provided data suitable for statistical analyses. The analyses demonstrated that surgery as a rescue therapy results in a clinically significant reduction in excessive sleepiness, snoring, blood pressure (BP), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), respiratory disturbance index (RDI), and oxygen desaturation index (ODI); an increase in lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT) and sleep quality; and an improvement in quality of life in adults with OSA who are intolerant or unaccepting of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. The analyses demonstrated that surgery as an adjunctive therapy results in a clinically significant reduction in optimal PAP pressure and improvement in PAP adherence in adults with OSA who are intolerant or unaccepting of PAP due to side effects associated with high pressure requirements. The analyses also demonstrated that surgery as an initial treatment results in a clinically significant reduction in AHI/RDI, sleepiness, snoring, BP, and ODI and an increase in LSAT in adults with OSA and major anatomical obstruction. Analysis of bariatric surgery data showed a clinically significant reduction in BP, AHI/RDI, sleepiness, snoring, optimal PAP level, BMI, and ODI and an increase in LSAT in adults with OSA and obesity. Analyses of very limited evidence suggested that upper airway surgery does not result in a clinically significant increase in risk of serious persistent adverse events and suggested that bariatric surgery may result in a clinically significant risk of iron malabsorption that may be managed with iron supplements. The task force provided a detailed summary of the evidence along with the quality of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations. Kent D, Stanley J, Aurora RN, etal. Referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea for surgical consultation: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(12):2507-2531.

Introduction Once-nightly sodium oxybate (ON-SXB; FT218), an investigational, extended-release treatment, was evaluated for the treatment of narcolepsy in adults in the phase 3 REST-ON clinical trial (NCT02720744). The 3 co-primary endpoints, mean sleep latency on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement rating, and weekly number of cataplexy attacks (NCA), and the secondary endpoint of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score were significant for ON-SXB vs placebo at weeks 3 (6-g dose), 8 (7.5-g dose), and 13 (9-g dose; all P< 0.001). These data were published after the cutoff for inclusion in the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) clinical practice guidelines for narcolepsy treatment; thus, REST-ON results were analyzed according to AASM clinical significance thresholds (CSTs). Methods Individuals with narcolepsy type 1/2 and age ≥16 years were randomized 1:1 to receive double-blind ON-SXB (4.5 g, 1 week; 6 g, 2 weeks; 7.5 g, 5 weeks; 9 g, 5 weeks) or matching placebo. For each dose (6 g, week 3; 7.5 g, week 8; and 9 g, week 13), least-squares mean (LSM) difference from placebo was calculated for change from baseline in mean sleep latency on the MWT, ESS score, and percentage reduction in NCA. As defined in the 2021 AASM guidelines, CSTs were the following changes vs placebo: MWT, ≥2-minute increase; ESS, ≥2-point decrease; and cataplexy, ≥25% decrease in NCA. Results 190 participants (ON-SXB, n=97; placebo, n=93) were in the modified intent-to-treat population. On the MWT, difference in LSM change from baseline was 5.0, 6.2, and 6.1 minutes for ON-SXB 6, 7.5, and 9 g vs placebo, respectively. Differences in LSM change from baseline ESS scores were −2.1, −3.2, and −3.9 for ON-SXB 6, 7.5, and 9 g vs placebo, respectively. Differences in LSM percentage reduction in NCA were 26.0%, 34.2%, and 36.1% for ON-SXB 6, 7.5, and 9 g vs placebo, respectively. Conclusion Clinically significant improvement in excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy per AASM-established criteria was met with ON-SXB 6, 7.5, and 9 g doses. If FDA approved, ON-SXB will provide a once-nightly treatment for improving EDS and cataplexy in adults with narcolepsy. Support (if any) Avadel Pharmaceuticals

Positive airway pressure (PAP) devices are used to treat patients with sleep related breathing disorders (SRBDs), including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). After a patient is diagnosed with OSA, the current standard of practice involves performing attended polysomnography (PSG), during which positive airway pressure is adjusted throughout the recording period to determine the optimal pressure for maintaining upper airway patency. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) represent the two forms of PAP that are manually titrated during PSG to determine the single fixed pressure of CPAP or the fixed inspiratory and expiratory positive airway pressures (IPAP and EPAP, respectively) of BPAP for subsequent nightly usage. A PAP Titration Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine reviewed the available literature. Based on this review, the Task Force developed these recommendations for conducting CPAP and BPAP titrations. Major recommendations are as follows: (1) All potential PAP titration candidates should receive adequate PAP education, hands-on demonstration, careful mask fitting, and acclimatization prior to titration. (2) CPAP (IPAP and/or EPAP for patients on BPAP) should be increased until the following obstructive respiratory events are eliminated (no specific order) or the recommended maximum CPAP (IPAP for patients on BPAP) is reached: apneas, hypopneas, respiratory effort-related arousals (RERAs), and snoring. (3) The recommended minimum starting CPAP should be 4 cm H2O for pediatric and adult patients, and the recommended minimum starting IPAP and EPAP should be 8 cm H2O and 4 cm H2O, respectively, for pediatric and adult patients on BPAP. (4) The recommended maximum CPAP should be 15 cm H2O (or recommended maximum IPAP of 20 cm H2O if on BPAP) for patients or = 12 years. (5) The recommended minimum IPAP-EPAP differential is 4 cm H2O and the recommended maximum IPAP-EPAP differential is 10 cm H2O (6) CPAP (IPAP and/or EPAP for patients on BPAP depending on the type of event) should be increased by at least 1 cm H2O with an interval no shorter than 5 min, with the goal of eliminating obstructive respiratory events. (7) CPAP (IPAP and EPAP for patients on BPAP) should be increased from any CPAP (or IPAP) level if at least 1 obstructive apnea is observed for patients or = 12 years. (8) CPAP (IPAP for patients on BPAP) should be increased from any CPAP (or IPAP) level if at least 1 hypopnea is observed for patients or = 12 years. (9) CPAP (IPAP for patients on BPAP) should be increased from any CPAP (or IPAP) level if at least 3 RERAs are observed for patients or = 12 years. (10) CPAP (IPAP for patients on BPAP) may be increased from any CPAP (or IPAP) level if at least 1 min of loud or unambiguous snoring is observed for patients or = 12 years. (11) The titration algorithm for split-night CPAP or BPAP titration studies should be identical to that of full-night CPAP or BPAP titration studies, respectively. (12) If the patient is uncomfortable or intolerant of high pressures on CPAP, the patient may be tried on BPAP. If there are continued obstructive respiratory events at 15 cm H2O of CPAP during the titration study, the patient may be switched to BPAP. (13) The pressure of CPAP or BPAP selected for patient use following the titration study should reflect control of the patient's obstructive respiration by a low (preferably 3 hr).

Lloyd R, Morgenthaler TI, Donald R, etal. Quality measures for the care of adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: 2022 update after measure maintenance. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(11):2673-2680.

Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and type 2 (NT2) are two rare neurological diseases, classified as central disorders of hypersomnolence. The pathophysiology of NT1 is well known; it is caused by the selective destruction of hypocretin (Hcrt) neurons, by a highly suspected autoimmune process. On the contrary, little is known about NT2 etiology, sharing with NT1 somnolence and signs of dysregulation of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, but not cataplexy. Management strategies are rather codified, at least in adults, with a lifelong treatment required in NT1, whereas no pharmacological study focused only on NT2 patients, with sometimes spontaneous improvement or disappearance of their symptoms. We recommend that medications and guidelines in NT2 should be the same as for NT1 (except for cataplexy), but the benefit risk ratio should be reassessed regularly. The main symptom in both diseases is a disabling excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). First-line medications should be stimulants such as modafinil, armodafinil, or sodium oxybate, second-line methylphenidate and pitolisant, where available, and amphetamines as third-line therapy. Sodium oxybate has the advantage to be also effective to manage the fragmented nocturnal sleep, another common symptom in NT1. We advise to wait a few weeks with a stimulant drug before starting an anticataplectic treatment in NT1, except for severe cataplexy. Furthermore, cataplexy treatment should not be systematic. First-line strategy is the use of sodium oxybate, the only drug approved for cataplexy and EDS in adults. However, antidepressant agents such as venlafaxine are also commonly used, with few adverse effects and a good efficacy, although based on expert consensus only. A clinically relevant tool is required to quantify the severity of narcolepsy, subjective symptoms, and their consequences, to monitor the treatment efficacy, and to finally optimize narcolepsy management. In the future, Hcrt replacement or Hcrt agonists will certainly be options to treat NT1, but for now the different peptides do not cross easily the blood brain barrier. Immune-based therapies are other possibilities in NT1, at disease onset, with already some successful attempts to slow down or stop the autoimmune process.

Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Unattended Portable Monitors in the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adult Patients

Seasonality of excessive daytime sleepiness has been proposed, yet no research has specifically investigated its impact on daytime sleepiness and cataplexy in central disorders of hypersomnolence. This study examined seasonal variations in daytime sleepiness and cataplexy in narcolepsy type 1, narcolepsy type 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia. Patients included in the study were on stable pharmacological treatment, and participated in sleep medicine interviews to assess diurnal sleepiness and daytime napping and completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale to assess excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale ≥ 10). Patients with narcolepsy type 1 also maintained a cataplexy diary. Evaluations were conducted in autumn, winter, spring and summer. The study included 29 patients with narcolepsy type 1, 16 patients with narcolepsy type 2 and 10 patients with idiopathic hypersomnia. Patients with narcolepsy type 1 and narcolepsy type 2 showed higher Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores in summer compared with other seasons, while patients with idiopathic hypersomnia showed no changes in excessive daytime sleepiness across the four seasons. Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores were higher in idiopathic hypersomnia patients compared to narcolepsy type 1 and narcolepsy type 2 patients in spring, autumn, and winter; conversely, in summer there were no differences in Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores among the three groups. No significant differences in Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores were noted between patients with narcolepsy type 1 and narcolepsy type 2 throughout the year. Furthermore, no seasonal effect on cataplexy frequency was found in patients with narcolepsy type 1. This study demonstrates that seasonality may influence daytime sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy type 1 and narcolepsy type 2 but not in patients with idiopathic hypersomnia, while cataplexy symptoms remain unaffected by seasonal changes. The underlying mechanisms linking excessive daytime sleepiness to seasonality have yet to be explored, though social factors and vacation time may contribute to increased excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy.

Subjective-objective sleepiness discrepancy in adult-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1.

Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is a chronic neurologic disorder defined by excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, sleep paralysis, hallucinations and disrupted nocturnal sleep, typically with onset during childhood/ adolescence. Pediatric NT1 is associated with limitations on children's activities and achievements, especially poor performance at school, difficulty with peers due to disease symptoms and comorbidities including depression, obesity, and precocious puberty. Sodium oxybate (SO) is a sodium salt of γ-hydroxybutyric (GHB) acid and is greatly effective in treating cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness in NT1 and it can be helpful also for sleep disruption, hypnagogic hallucination and sleep paralysis in these patients. We conducted a research of literature into bibliographic databases regarding NT1 features in childhood and the possible option treatment with SO in this kind of patient population. We reported sixteen papers focusing on symptom presentation and on clinical and metabolic features of children affected with NT1. Furthermore, we reported 24 manuscripts focusing on SO biological actions and pharmacological properties and on the few but important available studies (8) conducted in NT1 children under SO therapy. Although in the majority of patients develop NT1 during childhood, there are no approved treatments for pediatric NT1. However, SO has been widely used off-label to treat narcolepsy symptoms in children and adolescents with NT1 in non-controlled studies, showing a similar safety profile and therapeutic response to adult patients. Ongoing pediatric therapy is based only on observational data shared among sleep disorders clinicians.

Teleworking during a pandemic: perspective of an idiopathic hypersomnia patient.

Introduction Harmony Biosciences initiated the Pitolisant Expanded Access Clinical Evaluation (PEACE) program to allow treatment with pitolisant in adult patients with narcolepsy while pitolisant was an investigational medication in the United States. Starting in March 2019, Comprehensive Sleep Medicine Associates (CSMA) offered enrollment to patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and who were deemed appropriate based on clinical judgment. All patients who enrolled were taking at least one standard-of-care agent for narcolepsy at enrollment. Many of the enrolled patients had refractory/challenging cases of narcolepsy. On August 14, 2019, Wakix received FDA approval for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adult patients with narcolepsy, which contrasts with the European label that states that Wakix is indicated for the treatment of narcolepsy in adults with or without cataplexy. Methods CSMA enrolled 21 patients in the PEACE program. The charts for all 10 narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) patients were reviewed. The 2 patients who did not have follow up after starting pitolisant were excluded. Results Of the 8 NT1 patients who had at least one follow up visit after initiating pitolisant, 6 reported substantial improvement or complete resolution of cataplexy compared to baseline. For example, one patient’s wife stated, “I forgot my husband was funny because he would avoid telling jokes until he started pitolisant.” Another stated, “I have not had an episode of cataplexy since starting pitolisant.” 5 of these patients were taking an anti-cataplectic agent at the time of starting pitolisant (sodium oxybate 3, venlafaxine 2). Conclusion While a relatively small sample size, these results demonstrate that in a “real world” uncontrolled population of refractory/challenging NT1 patients, pitolisant is an effective anti-cataplectic agent. As there are relatively few treatment options for NT1, clinicians should consider use of pitolisant for patients with cataplexy, and further consideration for adding an indication for pitolisant to treat cataplexy is warranted. Support Harmony Biosciences (PEACE trial)

The purpose of this guideline is to establish clinical practice recommendations for the use of actigraphy in adult and pediatric patients with suspected or diagnosed sleep disorders or circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine to develop recommendations and assigned strengths based on a systematic review of the literature and an assessment of the evidence using the GRADE process. The task force provided a summary of the relevant literature and the quality of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations that support the recommendations. The AASM Board of Directors approved the final recommendations. The following recommendations are intended as a guide for clinicians using actigraphy in evaluating patients with sleep disorders and circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders, and only apply to the use of FDA-approved devices. Each recommendation statement is assigned a strength ("Strong" or "Conditional"). A "Strong" recommendation (ie, "We recommend…") is one that clinicians should follow under most circumstances. A "Conditional" recommendation (ie, "We suggest…") reflects a lower degree of certainty regarding the outcome and appropriateness of the patient-care strategy for all patients. The ultimate judgment regarding any specific care must be made by the treating clinician and the patient, taking into consideration the individual circumstances of the patient, available treatment options, and resources. We suggest that clinicians use actigraphy to estimate sleep parameters in adult patients with insomnia disorder. (Conditional). We suggest that clinicians use actigraphy in the assessment of pediatric patients with insomnia disorder. (Conditional). We suggest that clinicians use actigraphy in the assessment of adult patients with circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorder. (Conditional). We suggest that clinicians use actigraphy in the assessment of pediatric patients with circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorder. (Conditional). We suggest that clinicians use actigraphy integrated with home sleep apnea test devices to estimate total sleep time during recording (in the absence of alternative objective measurements of total sleep time) in adult patients suspected of sleep-disordered breathing. (Conditional). We suggest that clinicians use actigraphy to monitor total sleep time prior to testing with the Multiple Sleep Latency Test in adult and pediatric patients with suspected central disorders of hypersomnolence. (Conditional). We suggest that clinicians use actigraphy to estimate total sleep time in adult patients with suspected insufficient sleep syndrome. (Conditional). We recommend that clinicians not use actigraphy in place of electromyography for the diagnosis of periodic limb movement disorder in adult and pediatric patients. (Strong).

The purpose of this systematic review is to provide supporting evidence for a clinical practice guideline on the use of actigraphy. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine. A systematic review was conducted to identify studies that compared the use of actigraphy, sleep logs, and/or polysomnography. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the clinical significance of using actigraphy as an objective measure of sleep and circadian parameters. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to assess the evidence for making recommendations. The literature search resulted in 81 studies that met inclusion criteria; all 81 studies provided data suitable for statistical analyses. These data demonstrate that actigraphy provides consistent objective data that is often unique from patient-reported sleep logs for some sleep parameters in adult and pediatric patients with suspected or diagnosed insomnia, circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders, sleep-disordered breathing, central disorders of hypersomnolence, and adults with insufficient sleep syndrome. These data also demonstrate that actigraphy is not a reliable measure of periodic limb movements in adult and pediatric patients. The task force provided a detailed summary of the evidence along with the quality of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations.

The aim of the current study was to evaluate an attention test as a discriminative tool to measure neurocognitive impairment in patients with disorders of hypersomnolence. Chronic excessive daytime sleepiness is the main symptom in central disorders of hypersomnolence. For diagnostic purposes and treatment evaluation, reliable assessment of excessive daytime sleepiness is required. Thirty-six patients with central disorders of hypersomnolence were compared with 20 healthy controls. All participants performed the 'Perception and Attention Functions' (WAF) of the Vienna Test System. Patients underwent polysomnography, Multiple Sleep Latency Test and Maintenance of Wakefulness Test. Patients were divided into two groups: (i) patients who met the criteria of disorder of hypersomnolence (objective excessive daytime sleepiness); and (ii) patients with subjective excessive daytime sleepiness, i.e. with normal Multiple Sleep Latency Test results. Group 1 consisted of 23 patients with objective excessive daytime sleepiness (11 with idiopathic hypersomnia, nine with narcolepsy type 1, three with narcolepsy type 2); group 2 included 13 patients with subjective excessive daytime sleepiness. The results showed cognitive impairment in patients with objective excessive daytime sleepiness and even in patients with subjective excessive daytime sleepiness. WAF tests identified distinct attention profiles in patients with narcolepsy type 1, idiopathic hypersomnia/narcolepsy type 2, and patients with subjective excessive daytime sleepiness. WAF test measures correlated with Maintenance of Wakefulness Test and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, but not with Multiple Sleep Latency Test and the Fatigue Severity Scale. In conclusion, the multidimensional WAF test battery detects cognitive impairment even in patients that complain of excessive daytime sleepiness but have normal Multiple Sleep Latency Test results. WAF tests offer valuable information that adds to the existing polysomnographic measures in discriminating patients with different types of chronic excessive daytime sleepiness. The results provide new insights into cognitive dysfunction underlying different types of chronic excessive daytime sleepiness.