Quality of Life after Laparoscopic and Open Abdominal Myomectomy

Abstract

To evaluate the baseline and postoperative changes in quality of life and symptom-severity scores in women undergoing laparoscopic or open abdominal myomectomy for symptomatic myomas. Prospective cohort study of patients choosing myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas. Academic medical center. A total of 143 women enrolled in the study. Of these, 80 women completed both a preoperative questionnaire and at least 1 postoperative questionnaire between 6 and 27 months after surgery. A total of 52 women had open abdominal myomectomy, and 28 had laparoscopic myomectomy between October 2014 and September 2017. The results of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire were compared before and after laparoscopic or open myomectomy. Women undergoing open abdominal myomectomy had larger and more numerous myomas than women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy. Baseline quality-of-life scores were less adversely affected for women having laparoscopic myomectomy (mean [standard deviation], 57 [24] laparoscopic vs 43 [19] open abdominal, p = .01). However, baseline symptom-severity scores were statistically similar (49 [22] for laparoscopic and 57 [20] for open abdominal, p = .08) approaches. Six to 12 months after surgery, both open abdominal and laparoscopic surgeries provided excellent and similar improvements in symptom-severity and quality of life (postoperative symptoms severity scores, mean [standard deviation], 20 [14] laparoscopic vs 13 [11] open abdominal, p = .24 and quality-of-life scores, mean [standard deviation], 91 [16] laparoscopic vs 88 [17] open abdominal, p = .49). These improvements were sustained for women who returned questionnaires up to 27 months of follow-up. Women with symptomatic myomas have a compromised quality of life, and they experience a similarly dramatic improvement in quality of life and decrease in symptom-severity after both laparoscopic and open abdominal myomectomies.