Abstract
measures: quality control of risk measures (QCRM). The approach is applied to the problem of backtesting value-at-risk (VAR) models. VAR models are used to predict the maximum likely losses in a bank’s portfolio at a specified confidence level and time horizon. The widely accepted VAR backtesting procedure outlined by the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision controls the probability of rejecting the model when the model is correct. A drawback of the Basel approach is its limited power to control the probability of accepting an incorrect VAR model. By exploiting the binomial structure of the testing problem, QCRM provides a more balanced testing procedure, which results in a uniform reduction of the probability of accepting a wrong model. QCRM consists of three elements: the first is a new hypothesis-testing problem in which the null and alternative hypotheses are exchanged to control the probability of accepting an inaccurate model. The second element is a new approach for comparing the power of the QCRM and Basel tests in terms of the probability of rejecting correct and incorrect models. The third element involves the use of the technique of pivoting the cumulative distribution function to obtain one-sided confidence intervals for the probability of an exception. The use of these confidence intervals results in new acceptance/rejection regions for tests of the VAR model. We compare these to ones commonly used in the financial literature.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call