Abstract

In this paper, we proposed an efficient quality assurance method which can measure direct tissue maximum ratio (TMRDir), total scatter factor (Scp, Dir), wedge factor (WFDir), tissue phantom ratio 20/10 (TPR20/10Dir) by using a calibration water phantom and a Farmer chamber. The TMRDir was compared with the calculated TMR (TMRCal) that was calculated from the percentage depth dose at the time of the linear accelerator installation. Scp, Dir, WFDir and TPR20/10Dir calculated from TMRDir were compared with Scp, BD, WFBD, and TPR20/10BD measured at the time of the linear accelerator installation. The difference between TMRDir and TMRCal was approximately within 1% except for using 60° wedge filter. The difference between Scp, Dir and Scp, BD was within 1%, between WFDir and WFBD was within 2%, between TPR20/10Dir and TPR20/10BD was within 1%, these differences were acceptable levels of AAPM TG-142 report. Also, coefficient of variation (CV) of TMRDir, ScpDir, WFDir and TPR20/10Dir when changing days and measuring multiple times were approximately within 1%, these CVs were reference levels of AAPM TG-106 report. We validated that was an efficient quality assurance method by measuring direct tissue maximum ratio, but the propose method has limited in measurable field size.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call