Abstract

The trend of carrying out a systematic review of systematic reviews has just been concentrated in clinical-effectiveness. In aspect of cost-effective-ness, there has not been any review of reviews implemented in economic evaluation of hepatitis. The aim of this study is to appraise qualitatively a range of systematic reviews of economic evaluation in case of hepatitis based on PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was made on Medline, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library databases till August 2016. Search terms used were “review” OR (“literature”, “systematic”) AND “economic evaluation” OR (“cost effectiveness”, “cost benefit”, “cost utility”, “cost minimization”) AND “hepatitis” OR (“hep*”, “H?V”). A total of 25 articles researching economic evaluations of hepatitis were identified. Approxi-mately three-forth of articles (n=18; 72%) are classified in “Intermediate”, following by “Bad” with five papers (20%). The categories “Very Bad” and “Good” share the last two papers. None of papers achieves the “Excel-lent”. Seventeen is the most popular point gained by seven papers (28%). In short, PRISMA was proved to be an effective instrument due to its im-portant role in assessing included reviews. Even though there are various systematic reviews of economic evaluation published, their qualities are not synchronous and the number of studies which was really carried out based on PRISMA is modest. How to Cite this Article Pubmed Style Quang Vinh Tran, Phuong Hong Le, Trung Quang Vo. Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Studies. SRP. 2017; 8(1): 52-61. doi:10.5530/srp.2017.1.10 Web Style Quang Vinh Tran, Phuong Hong Le, Trung Quang Vo. Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Studies. http://www.sysrevpharm.org/?mno=302644564 [Access: March 28, 2021]. doi:10.5530/srp.2017.1.10 AMA (American Medical Association) Style Quang Vinh Tran, Phuong Hong Le, Trung Quang Vo. Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Studies. SRP. 2017; 8(1): 52-61. doi:10.5530/srp.2017.1.10 Vancouver/ICMJE Style Quang Vinh Tran, Phuong Hong Le, Trung Quang Vo. Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Studies. SRP. (2017), [cited March 28, 2021]; 8(1): 52-61. doi:10.5530/srp.2017.1.10 Harvard Style Quang Vinh Tran, Phuong Hong Le, Trung Quang Vo (2017) Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Studies. SRP, 8 (1), 52-61. doi:10.5530/srp.2017.1.10 Turabian Style Quang Vinh Tran, Phuong Hong Le, Trung Quang Vo. 2017. Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Reviews in Pharmacy, 8 (1), 52-61. doi:10.5530/srp.2017.1.10 Chicago Style Quang Vinh Tran, Phuong Hong Le, Trung Quang Vo. Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Studies. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 8 (2017), 52-61. doi:10.5530/srp.2017.1.10 MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style Quang Vinh Tran, Phuong Hong Le, Trung Quang Vo. Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Studies. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 8.1 (2017), 52-61. Print. doi:10.5530/srp.2017.1.10 APA (American Psychological Association) Style Quang Vinh Tran, Phuong Hong Le, Trung Quang Vo (2017) Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Reviews in Pharmacy, 8 (1), 52-61. doi:10.5530/srp.2017.1.10

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.