Abstract
Every year, the availability of public IPv4 addresses is running low. However, the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) has set a new addressing standard called IPv6 (Internet Protocol version 6). IPv6 implementations can not be immediately performed on all end-to-end lines, a transition phase is required, one of which is the GRE tunneling method. IPv6 has some differences with IPv4, then in line with the presence of IPv6 will required the protocol that compatible with IPv6, among which is the routing protocol. Some dynamic routing protocols are created to support and can run on IPv6 such as RIPng and OSPFv3. Aim of this study is examines OSPFv3 routing protocols and RIPng routing protocols in terms of Quality of Service (QoS). The test is done by using seven routers with three scenarios in each routing protocol, ie scenario with best path active condition, when the network changes in other words best path down, and the scenario with best path condition has changed and the network has returned to normal. Testing is done by testing QoS parameters (delay, packet loss, and throughput) when the client computer downloads files with the .iso extension from the server. Downloaded files have different sizes, from 100 Mega Byte to 1 Giga Byte. From the results obtained that OSPFv3 provides better QoS (delay, packet loss, and throughput) than RIPng on integrated IPv6 network using GRE tunnel and can be a reference when going to transition from IPv4 to IPv6 using GRE Tunnel.
Highlights
Based on data from LACNICLabs Opendata, from year to year the availability of public IP Address version 4 (IPv4) addresses is descreasing, recorded on May 23, 2014 available 19,435,520 IPv4 for regional APNIC, but on May 24, 2017 the remaining 6,442,496 IPv4
This research proved that the link state protocol represented by OSPF is better than the distance vector protocol represented by RIP based on jitter, packet loss, and faster parameters in terms of time required for convergence as well as for routing table updates [6]
Quality of Service (QoS) testing is done by capturing the packet using wire shark tool, calculation of the communication that occurs between the client and server to obtain the average value of delay and packet loss
Summary
Based on data from LACNICLabs Opendata (opendata.labs.lacnic.net), from year to year the availability of public IPv4 addresses is descreasing, recorded on May 23, 2014 available 19,435,520 IPv4 for regional APNIC, but on May 24, 2017 the remaining 6,442,496 IPv4. Performance testing of RIPng, OSPFv3 and EIGRP routing protocols in the IPv6 network using. Evaluate the performance of different routing protocols such as RIP and OSPF for IPv6 using the OPNET 14.5 simulator and obtain the result that Packet Delay variations in Video Conferencing, based on jitter parameters, end to end delay, received traffic, and traffic transmitted in voice and object response times and page response time in HTTP performs better in OSPFv3_RIPng (combination of RIPng and OSPFv3) than RIPng or OSPFv3. This research proved that the link state protocol represented by OSPF is better than the distance vector protocol represented by RIP based on jitter, packet loss, and faster parameters in terms of time required for convergence as well as for routing table updates [6]. Quality of Service (QoS) has a flow of data packets that are used as measuring parameters of Service Internet Protocol Network: reliability; packet loss, bandwidth; and throughput
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
