Pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical results.

Abstract

Hemiarthroplasty is often considered in the setting of preserved glenoid cartilage given the high risk of revision associated with total shoulder arthroplasty. Pyrocarbon (PyC) has been used as an implant material that theoretically allows for formation of a neo-membrane that would act like cartilage to reduce glenoid wear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, revision rates, and complication rates in the existing literature on shoulder hemiarthroplasty using PyC. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for articles relating to shoulder hemiarthroplasty using the terms "pyrocarbon" or "pyrolytic carbon." Abstracts and articles were screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with a minimum of 24 months' follow-up required. Data on patient demographic characteristics, clinical outcome scores, complications, revision rates, and radiographic findings were recorded. Where appropriate, meta-analysis was performed. Twelve studies were selected for final inclusion, with a total of 536 patients. Among the studies reporting preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), an overall improvement in ROM was observed. The mean Constant score was 70.9 points postoperatively, with a mean improvement of 36.2 points (n=359, 9 studies). Radiographically, 22.8% of patients (n=536, 8 studies) had evidence of glenoid erosion, 10.4% had changes in implant positioning, and 9.9% had tuberosity thinning. In addition, 1.5% of patients had radiographic subacromial space reduction, whereas 0.7% had an increase in tuberosity thickness. Across all studies, there was an 8.6% complication rate, with the most common cause being glenoid erosion (2.6%, n=14). There was an overall 7.7% revision rate (n=41), with 63% of revisions (n=26) undergoing conversion to reverse or total shoulder arthroplasty. PyC hemiarthroplasty shows overall improvements in ROM and patient-reported outcomes for patients. However, there remains concern for glenoid erosion on radiographic evaluation at minimum 2-year follow-up. Although preliminary studies have shown encouraging results, this systematic review emphasizes the need for longer-term follow-up studies with further radiographic evaluation of the severity of glenoid erosion and the association with functional outcomes and failure risk.