Abstract

This chapter examines the experiences of two female leaders in New Zealand state primary schools and their experiences of turning their schools around. Leading schools through times of change and challenge is complex, especially when issues of school underperformance and student achievement are intertwined. In some instances, such circumstances result in educational authorities imposing an intervention such as a ‘turnaround’ program. Each year a small number of New Zealand schools are considered ‘underperforming’ and require external leadership assistance, usually from the Ministry of Education. This support is implemented through a statutory intervention mechanism aimed to address underpinning issues such as governance and leadership matters, low student academic achievement, issues of finance, and student and staff safety and wellbeing (Ministry of Education, 2017). While statutory interventions have been enacted in New Zealand since 1994 as a mechanism to ‘turn a school around’, there is little research about what this experience is like for educational leaders in primary (elementary) schools, or how it affects their professional and personal lives. Within the turnaround school literature, educational leaders are often positioned as ‘heroic leaders’, usually male, seeking to change the school’s climate and culture. However, there is little literature discussing how female educational leaders approach school recovery processes. With sparse acknowledgement of the effects this work has on a leader's professional and personal life, it is within these spaces that this research on female leaders’ experiences is situated. This study was part of a doctoral research project undertaken in 2016 to explore New Zealand primary school leaders’ perceptions and experiences of working to turnaround schools and addressing complex and challenging circumstances within their schools and communities. Using Dewey’s theory of experiences, the professional and personal experiences of two female leaders’ leading such schools are focused on to understand how their leadership is, in Clandinin and Rosick’s (2007) terms, constituted, shaped, expressed and enacted. The research revealed the professional and personal struggles both women encountered in their journey to turn their schools around, and contributes critical findings to the research focused on women’s experiences when turning schools around.

Highlights

  • While statutory interventions have been enacted in New Zealand since 1994 as a mechanism to “turn a school around,” there has been limited research into the performance of statutory intervention processes

  • There is still no research on New Zealand primary school principals, especially those leading small schools under intervention, nor is there New Zealand research into the experiences of women leaders and the personal cost as they seek to turn around underperforming primary schools

  • This study focused on the perceptions of two women primary school leaders and their experiences of leading schools through a statutory intervention

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While statutory interventions have been enacted in New Zealand since 1994 as a mechanism to “turn a school around,” there has been limited research into the performance of statutory intervention processes (see Manion, 2008; Office of the Auditor-General, 2008, 2010; Ministry of Education, 2014a,b; Udahemuka, 2016, 2017a,b). These reviews have continually raised concerns about the consistency of monitoring schools and the lack of transparent intervention processes. With sparse acknowledgment of how statutory interventions affects women leaders’ professional and personal lives, it is within these spaces that my research on women principals’ experiences is situated

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call