Abstract
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin after cementation with glass ionomer (GICs) and resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs).Material and MethodsFifty human maxillary canines were transversally sectioned at 15 mm from the apex. Canals were prepared with a step back technique until the application of a #55 K-file and filled. Post spaces were prepared and specimens were divided into five groups according to the cement used for post cementation: Luting & Lining Cement; Fuji II LC Improved; RelyX Luting; Ketac Cem; and Ionoseal. After cementation of the glass fiber posts, all roots were stored at 100% humidity until testing. For push-out test, 1-mm thick slices were produced. The push-out test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute and the values (MPa) were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene's tests and by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test at a significance level of 5%.ResultsFiber posts cemented using Luting & Lining Cement, Fuji II LC Improved, and Ketac Cem presented the highest bond strength to root dentin, followed by RelyX Luting. Ionoseal presented the lowest bond strength values (P>0.05). The post level did not influence the bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin (P=0.148). The major cause of failure was cohesive at the cement for all GICs and RMGICs.ConclusionsExcept for Ionoseal, all cements provided satisfactory bond strength values.
Highlights
Damaged teeth have been maintained in function through the association between endodontic and prosthetic treatments
The Tukey’s post hoc test demonstrated that fiber posts cemented using Luting & Lining Cement, Fuji II Cement LC Improved, and Ketac Cem presented the highest bond strength to root dentin, followed by RelyX Luting
The restoration of endodontically treated teeth is based on materials that have an elastic modulus similar to that of dentin, that are capable of creating homogeneous stress
Summary
Damaged teeth have been maintained in function through the association between endodontic and prosthetic treatments. The loss of coronal tooth structure results in using the root canal to retain the direct or indirect restoration. Q DGGLWLRQ ¿EHU SRVWV PLQLPL]H GHQWLQ UHPRYDO preserving root structure and strength, and due to their translucency better aesthetic properties are observed1 3UHIDEULFDWHG ¿EHU SRVWV VLPSOLI\ the restorative procedures because all steps are performed by the dentist in a single visit. The high C-factor is responsible for disrupting the cement/dentin interface, creating gaps and impairing the bond sealing of resin cements . 23,26 The dislocation resistance of adhesive-bonded fiber posts is largely derived from sliding friction instead of true adhesion to root dentin. Cement-dentin interface is more susceptible to adhesive failures in comparison with cement-post interface, especially GXH WR UHDFWLYDWLRQ RI WKH ¿EHU SRVW VXUIDFH YLD chemomechanical pretreatments
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have