Abstract

Piano performance motor learning research requires more “artful” methodologies if it is to meaningfully address music performance as a corporeal art. To date, research has been sparse and it has typically constrained multiple performance variables in order to isolate specific phenomena. This approach has denied the fundamental ethos of music performance which, for elite performers, is an act of interpretation, not mere reproduction. Piano performances are intentionally manipulated for artistic expression. We documented motor movements in the complex task of performance of the first six measures of Chopin’s “Revolutionary” Etude by two anthropometrically different elite pianists. We then discussed their motor strategy selections as influenced by anthropometry and the composer’s musical directives. To quantify the joint angles of the trunk, shoulders, elbows, and wrists, we used a VICON 3 D motion capture system and biomechanical modeling. A Kistler force plate (1 N, Swiss) quantified center of gravity (COG) shifts. Changes in COG and trunk angles had considerable influence on the distal segments of the upper limbs. The shorter pianist used an anticipatory strategy, employing larger shifts in COG and trunk angles to produce dynamic stability as compensation for a smaller stature. Both pianists took advantage of low inertial left shoulder internal rotation and adduction to accommodate large leaps in the music. For the right arm, motor strategizing was confounded by rests in the music. These two cases illustrated, in principle, that expert pianists’ individualized motor behaviors can be explained as compensatory efforts to accommodate both musical goals and anthropometric constraints. Motor learning among piano students can benefit from systematic attention to motor strategies that consider both of these factors.

Highlights

  • Instrumental music performance ranks among the most complex of learned human behaviors (Visentin et al, 2015)

  • Five joint angle range of motion (ROM) were very similar between participants

  • center of gravity (COG) excursion was much larger for A in the medial/lateral plane while it was larger for B in the anterior/ posterior plane (295.0 mm vs 209.6 mm, and 51.1 mm vs 43.0 mm, respectively)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Instrumental music performance ranks among the most complex of learned human behaviors (Visentin et al, 2015). A professional pianist performing the 11th variation of Franz Liszt’s 6th Paganini-Etude must play up to 1800 notes per minute for some sections of the music (Munte et al, 2002). Low tolerance for errors, and high endurance requirements of music performance, it has been categorized by many as an athletic endeavour (Dick et al, 2013; Quarrier, 1993). The quantitative literature in human movement science pertaining to music pedagogy and motor learning is only beginning to emerge (D’Amato et al, 2020; Furuya & Altenmuller, 2013; Visentin et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call