Abstract

Pulsatile endogenous cortisol secretion is critical for physiological glucocorticoid gene signaling. Conventional glucocorticoid replacement therapy does not mimic endogenous cortisol pulsing in primary adrenal insufficiency. In an open-labeled, two-week, nonrandomized cross-over study of five patients with adrenal insufficiency (Addison's disease in two, bilateral adrenalectomy in one, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia in two patients) we compared pulsatile and continuous cortisol pump treatment and conventional oral glucocorticoid therapy with respect to 24-h serum corticosteroid levels and plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). Pulsed pump restored ultradian rhythmicity as demonstrated by five peaks of serum (all patients) and subcutaneous tissue cortisol (four patients). Morning subcutaneous cortisol and cortisone were higher in continuous and pulsed pump treatment than in oral therapy despite nearly similar serum cortisol levels in all treatment arms. ACTH was within the physiological range during pulsed pump treatment in all patients except for slightly elevated levels in the morning hours 04:00-08:00 h. During oral therapy, ACTH was very high in patients with Addison's disease and suppressed in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. In conclusions, mimicking endogenous cortisol rhythmicity by ultradian subcutaneous infusion of cortisol is feasible. It was superior to both continuous pump and oral therapy in maintaining normal ACTH levels throughout the 24-h cycle. Our results demonstrate a low free cortisol bioavailability on thrice daily oral replacement therapy compared to both types of subcutaneous infusion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.