Abstract

Abstract Pulpotomy was performed in primary teeth of 4 vervet monkeys to compare the effect of an experimental dressing containing glutaraldehyde (GL) to a similar formula with paraformaldehyde (PF). Forty teeth were examined histologically 2 weeks to 5 months post‐operatively. In the PF group, calcifications were more frequently observed and the central core of tissue in the root canal was heavily laden with debris. Pathologic apical resorption and lesions were more frequent. The pulp in the apical third of the root canal was usually uninflamed in the GL group and peripheral calcifications were seldom observed in it. Reaction to GL seemed, therefore, more favorable clinically. Defects were not observed in the permanent teeth that erupted following shedding or extraction of the experimental primary ones of either group.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call