Abstract
The intravascular stent technique (IVaS) was developed to simplify the anastomosis of submillimeter blood vessels. One variation of the IVaS called the “clip stent”, improved the patency of anastomosed vessels. The goal of this study was to analyze a subsequent technical variation called the “pull out stent”, which aims to reduce trauma to the vessel. Our experimental study comprised 4 groups of 10 rats. Anastomosis of the tail artery was performed with 10-0 nylon suture using either interrupted sutures (group I), IVaS (group II), “clip stent” (group III), or “pull out stent” (group IV). The “pull out stent” technique consisted of 3 steps: introduction of the stent (intraluminal and then transluminal introduction of a 4-0 nylon monofilament followed by introduction of the other end into the opposite lumen), anastomosis, and then removal of the stent. The anastomosis procedure time was longer in group III than in group IV. The number of stitches and the patency were similar in all groups. There were more leaks in group I. The “pull out stent” was faster, less traumatic to the vessel wall, allowed for more regular sutures and caused fewer leaks than the other stenting techniques. One possible clinical application is the anastomosis of digital veins as part of replantation or toe transfers, especially in children.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have