Abstract

The success of university campuses depends on the interrelations between creative encounters and the built environment, conceptualised here as spatial affordances for creativity. Such an interface plays a fundamental role in interactions for knowledge sharing and the exchange of ideas on campus. Due to campus public spaces generally being considered as the leftovers between buildings and classrooms, undermanaged, and overlooked, little is known about the extent to which this built environment enables or inhibits creative encounters in such spaces. The inner-city campuses and science parks (SPs) of Amsterdam and Utrecht, the case-studies of this research, differ in terms of their location relative to the city, their masterplan typologies and the arrangement of buildings. However, they are similar in terms of the aforementioned issues of public spaces. The novelty of this research is the attempt to overcome such issues using an innovative mixed-methods approach that tests the ‘spatial affordances for creativity’ with empirical data collection and analysis. This raises the importance of mapping, quantifying and analysing the spatial distribution of momentary perceptions, experiences, and feelings of people with methods such as volunteered geographic information (VGI). The results show that proximity between multiple urban functions and physical features, such as parks, cafés and urban seating are important when it comes to explaining the high frequency of creative encounters between people. Urban designers of campuses can use the applied method as a tool to plan and design attractive public spaces that provide creativity through the transfer of tacit knowledge, social well-being, positive momentary perceptions, sense of community, and a sense of place.

Highlights

  • University campuses are vital actors in the global knowledge economy, central players in emergent innovation systems and active agents that can play a driving role in the innovation process and commercialization of knowledge [1,2,3]

  • Because the content analysis of photography was undertaken according to high-value cells, as indicated by the respondents, it is important to point out some noteworthy outcomes: (1) science parks (SPs) are spatially isolated from the rest of the city and their roads and sidewalks are arranged as an orthogonal grid, the results show that the vast offer of public spaces together with the mix of educational, research and private organizations can influence interdisciplinary encounters, and creativity

  • We studied spatial affordances for creativity at university public spaces in the cities of Amsterdam and Utrecht

Read more

Summary

Introduction

University campuses are vital actors in the global knowledge economy, central players in emergent innovation systems and active agents that can play a driving role in the innovation process and commercialization of knowledge [1,2,3]. As suggested by Glaeser [4], the co-presence of educated individuals in one location is linked to new ideas, creativity and, long-term economic growth. Public spaces at university campuses are important knowledge and creative hubs and enablers of creativity as well as social well-being through a sense of place and community [5,6,7]. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7421; doi:10.3390/ijerph17207421 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call