Abstract
This article unveils that government is intertwined with banking through a hitherto underexplored channel—through public procurement. On a comprehensive firm-level dataset that combines public procurement and accounting data, we apply the difference-in-differences method to show that treated firms that secure a public procurement contract can strengthen their bank borrowing terms. Treated firms obtain a greater amount of bank funding and a higher share of long-term funding at lower interest rates compared to the control firms. The impact on bank lending exceeds the positive impact due to higher revenues and suggests a positive non-revenue channel of public procurement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
