Abstract
ABSTRACT This article addresses the relationships between emotions and the law, and how they define public order and constitute emotional legal landscapes. Using the example of the litigation process of the censorship of Dries Verhoeven’s art installation Ceci n’est pas … we explore the power of individual and collective emotions in acting as a stimulus to the evaluation of the acceptability and legality of artworks in urban public spaces. Verhoeven’s installation was interrupted in Helsinki, Finland, because of public obscenity after a passer-by who was offended by the artwork reported it to the police. This led to a three-year court process, the legal archaeological analysis of which reveals the complex moral geographies in the formation of legal landscapes: the arbitrariness of the interpretation of the law, the significance of time and place in legal evaluation, and the hidden morals included in the understanding of public order. The results show the potential of the concept of emotional legal landscapes in exploring the spatial effects of legal processes, and in revealing how legal reasoning is complex and emotionally laden instead of being carried out by rational legal actors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
