Abstract

This study examines the effects of public information on players’ actions in global games with strategic complements and substitutes. Specifically, we consider the protest game, wherein a group of citizens decide whether to participate in a protest against a government. After observing private signals and a public signal about the government’s strength, each citizen decides whether or not to participate in the protest. The participation can be both strategic complements and strategic substitutes because the number of protesters increases both the probability of protest success and the probability of a government crackdown. We find that the likelihood of protest success decreases (increases) with the precision of the public signal if the government’s strength is expected to be strong (weak). However, increasing the precision of the public signal is more likely to reduce citizens’ participation as protest decisions exhibit more strategic substitutability.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.