Abstract

Background: Health sector decentralization, defined as the transfer of decision making over health sector resources from a central to a peripheral entity; has been and continues to be a widely adopted health system reforms in many low and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, its reported effects have been varied. Nevertheless, decentralization reforms aimed at providing public hospital management autonomy are increasing in prevalence in many LMICs. The range and form of this autonomy because of these reforms has often produced mixed effects. We set out to understand the range of financial management autonomy that has been granted to public hospitals in decentralized health systems in LMICs, and what forms of accountability arrangements have been used to facilitate this autonomy. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and CINAHL databases for published articles on this subject. We only included articles that reported empirical findings on hospital level financing and financial management in the context of decentralization in LMICs and/or those that included findings on hospital level finance management accountability arrangements. After a systematic search we found four articles that met our inclusion criteria. We undertook a thematic synthesis of the data and narrative reporting of our findings. Results: From the review – we find that decentralization reforms did not result in improved funding flows, finance management autonomy or accountability mechanisms and for public hospitals. These outcomes were irrespective of the mode and form of decentralization reform adopted. Conclusion: From our review, it is evident that though health sector decentralization reforms have been widely promoted and adopted in the past few decades across LMICs, there is minimal evidence that these reforms have improved funding flows to public hospitals, improved financial management autonomy or accountability mechanisms; so as to enhance the performance of these hospitals at sub-national level.

Highlights

  • Decentralization, defined as the transfer of power or authority on decision making and resource management, from the central government or body to the local level or subnational unit or institution, has been and continues to be a common health sector reform in many low and middle-income countries (LMICs)[1]

  • In Kenya during the health system deconcentration era, hospitals were financed through budget allocation from the national Ministry of Health (MoH), collected user fees from chargeable services in the hospital, donor funding and National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) re-imbursements – for services rendered to NHIF beneficiaries

  • The study reported that the funds from national MoH allocation were always delayed or failed to reach the hospitals, leaving hospitals practically relying on the user fees they collected for their day to day utility needs[11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decentralization, defined as the transfer of power or authority on decision making and resource management, from the central government or body to the local level or subnational unit or institution, has been and continues to be a common health sector reform in many low and middle-income countries (LMICs)[1]. Conclusion: From our review, it is evident that though health sector decentralization reforms have been widely promoted and adopted in the past few decades across LMICs, there is minimal evidence that these reforms have improved funding flows to public hospitals, improved financial management autonomy or accountability mechanisms; so as to enhance the performance of these hospitals at sub-national level

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.