Abstract
BackgroundMany common mental disorders are underdiagnosed and undertreated in low-resource countries. The ten-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) is a brief screening tool widely used to assess psychological distress. We evaluated the K10’s performance in an Ethiopian population by assessing internal consistency and construct validity through factor structure. MethodsK10 survey responses and sociodemographic data were collected from 1928 adults, including patients and caregivers from a general medical setting, who served as controls of a large epidemiological study. ResultsThe K10 had good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83. Results from exploratory factor analyses showed that the K10 had a two-factor solution that accounted for approximately 66% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that a unidimensional model with correlated errors, informed by a theoretical model, was the best fitting model for the setting (comparative fit index of 0.90 and root mean square error of approximation of 0.10). LimitationsWe did not assess the K10’s test-retest reliability or its criterion validity (i.e., agreement with a reference measure). ConclusionsBased on internal consistency and construct validity, the K10 can effectively assess psychological distress among Ethiopian adults for population-based research and potentially clinical screening, consistent with previous findings in this setting. Further studies are needed to test its criterion validity against a reference measure of psychological distress.
Accepted Version
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call