Psychometric measurement properties and reference values of the six-spot step test, the six-minute walk test, the 25-foot walk test, and the 12-item multiple sclerosis walking scale in people with multiple sclerosis.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Based on PubMed and Embase searches, psychometric as well as descriptive data of T25FW, 6MWT, SSST, and MSWS-12 were extracted from studies evaluating persons with MS (pwMS). Descriptive data was also extracted from healthy controls (HC), if reported. Data was displayed as median [IQR]. A total of n=84 studies (N=36.929 pwMS, 64% females, age 49.6 [43;51] yrs; N=3.093 HC, 40.0 [37.5;47.5] yrs) were included. In pwMS, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) was 4.0 [3.0;4.8], patient determined disease scale (PDDS) 2.6 [2.0;3.0], time since diagnosis 11.6 [9.9;13.2] yrs, and MS-phenotypes (RR/SP/PP/unknown) were 68/19/10/3%. PwMS performed substantially worse than HC across all walking capacity outcomes. Weak to strong associations were found for construct validity (r=0.29-0.88, EDSS or PDDS and walking capacity or ability outcomes) and concurrent validity (r=0.16-0.88 between walking capacity and ability, r=0.73-0.95 between walking capacity outcomes). Ecological validity showed weak to moderate associations between daily steps and walking outcomes (r=0.42-0.68). Good to excellent test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability were reported across outcomes (ICC=0.71-1.00). Responsiveness was most frequently reported as the minimal-clinically-important-difference, minimal-detectable-change, or as the minimal-important-change (data not shown). Overall the T25FW, 6MWT, SSST, and MSWS-12 demonstrate moderate to excellent psychometric properties (i.e., valid, reliable, and responsive to changes), which make them clinically useful and applicable to research.