Abstract
Summary Volunteer male and female college students (N = 156) rated themselves on Sciortino's Inventory of Psychological Processes (IPP-3), immediately after the production and revision stages of Sciortino's Solutions Test. The production stage was administered under “quantity-stressing” instructions and the revision stage under “criteria-cued” instructions. Ss' combined scores on the IPP-3, from both the production and revision stages, were, first, subjected to a principal components analysis and, then, rotated according to the equamax procedure. Seven equamax factors were extracted: that is, accomplishment, frustration, evaluated modification, variegated thinking, insightful thinking, motivated associative thinking, and freewheeled thinking. Ss' scores on each of the above seven equamax factors were then subjected to an analysis of variance for repeated measures. The results show that the mean values of factors frustration, variegated thinking, motivated associative thinking, and freewheeled thinking were significantly higher (either at the .05 or at .01 level) in the production than in the revision stage. Moreover, the mean values of factors accomplishment and evaluated modification were significantly higher (at the .01 level) in the revision than in the production stage. However, the difference between the mean values of factor insightful thinking in the production and revision stages was not significant at the .05 level.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.