Abstract

In analyzing vehicle interior noise there exists hardly any correlation between the subjective impressions of test persons and available roughness parameters. It has become necessary to develop a new roughness model for these sounds and to set up a subjective database as a basis for the analytical description of interior noise quality. This paper focuses on psychoacoustical experiments for the assessment of roughness by using different methods and different kinds of vehicle interior sounds. The analysis of the results shows that small experimental manipulations lead to a large variety of different results. The different meanings of the word roughness have to be taken into account. Each person has his or her own interpretation of roughness differing between the phenomena of roughness, r-roughness, rumble, fluctuation strength, etc. Another important point is the reduction of accidental influences of psychoacoustical parameters, like, for example, the influence of loudness on the perception of roughness. By using a special headphone–subwoofer playback system in the laboratory, it is possible to achieve ratings comparable with field experiments. As reported in a companion paper, a new generalized psycho- acoustical model of modulation parameters was successfully tested with the obtained roughness rankings.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.