Providing Cognitive Remediation Therapy to People with Schizophrenia: Results of a Survey in Psychiatric Clinics in Germany

Abstract

Schizophrenia is accompanied by significant cognitive impairments, which often persist to a relevant extent after remission of clinical symptoms and has a negative impact on psychosocial functioning. These impairments are often experienced as very stressful by those affected. Under the umbrella term of Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT), evidence-based therapy options are available that improve both the respective cognitive target functions and the psychosocial functioning. According to expert recommendations, at least 20 sessions should be carried out, accompanied by qualified therapeutic staff. The current edition of the S3 treatment guideline schizophrenia of the German Society for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Neurology recommends CRT with the highest level of recommendation. It is unclear to what extent CRT has become part of routine inpatient care. Between July 2021 and May 2022, 395 psychiatric university hospitals and non-university psychiatric specialist hospitals in Germany were invited to fill in a 14-item questionnaire. A total of 103 institutions took part in the survey; 56.3% of these hospitals used at least one evidence-based CRT programme. Among the CRT programmes used, Cogpack, Rehacom and the Integriertes Psychologisches Therapieprogramm (IPT) were named most frequently. In 87.5% of the participating facilities, fewer than half of the people with schizophrenia received CRT. With regard to the clinics which used evidence-based CRT, 64.3% carried out fewer than 11 therapy sessions, 28.6% between 11 and 20 sessions and 7.2% more than 20 sessions. It is thus clear that CRT is not yet offered in all of the participating psychiatric hospitals in Germany, not yet for all people with schizophrenia, and not yet with sufficient intensity, with clinics indicating the need for more technical and personnel resources and more extensive development of competencies for CRT application.The low response rate of 26.1% and possible selection effects for participation in the study are addressed and are to be seen as limitations.