Abstract

In eighteenth-century, Britain was experiencing success in international arena, increase in economic conditions, improvement in education and developments in arts and sciences. However, especially the advance in natural sciences and the growing popularity of rationalism harmed the political, social and psychological power of religion during the aforementioned period. Due to the religious controversies, Protestant principles lost their crucial role in maintaining the political and social order in Great Britain. Besides internal threats, the country had experienced external threats –such as France- as well. The peril of France was also considered as a direct threat of Catholicism to the Anglican Church. Therefore, the Anglican Church needed to be defended against both the internal and external threats. As a result, the church was re-established as the basis of political and moral order by the attempts of Anglican thinkers and religious men. In order to show how Anglicans had promoted their religious principles, the works of John Brown (1715-1766) -one of the most influential religious men of the period- were analysed. The controversy between Protestantism and Catholicism, namely between Great Britain and France, led Brown to use Protestantism as the basis of English liberty and attack to Catholicism by means of the concept of “liberty” provided by Protestant principles. At this point Brown defended Anglicanism and indicate Anglican’s opposition to Catholicism in terms of liberty. The aim of this paper is to reveal how the concept of ‘liberty’ and Protestantism were used together in order to preserve the commonwealth in Great Britain. In addition, how the concept of liberty changed in John Brown’s works after the threat of Catholicism and became a social concept in the English Enlightenment is also examined.

Highlights

  • In eighteenth-century, Britain was experiencing success in international arena, increase in economic conditions, improvement in education and developments in arts and sciences

  • The aim of this paper is to reveal how the concept of liberty was used together with Protestantism for the preservation of the commonwealth, how it was changed in John Brown’s works after the threat of Catholicism as it became a social concept in English Enlightenment

  • Since the religion was introduced as the political tool to prevent Great Britain from future threats and to protect the welfare of the empire, Brown gave up his liberal ideas mentioned in his early works

Read more

Summary

The Chain of Morality

Brown’s first work called Honour: A Poem was published in 1743. The analysis of this poem is necessary in order to understand how Brown enlarged the concept of virtue as a social virtue in his later works. Religion and its “Sanctions of future Rewards and Punishments, from which it derives its Force, must be very strongly impressed on the human Mind” (1751:32-33) to maintain social and political order This brought Brown (1751) naturally to indicate that true religion, Protestantism, was the source of virtue, truth and freedom in Great Britain. Until 1751 he explained the similarity between truth and virtue, the co-existence of truth and liberty, the necessity of reason to rectify passions and religion as the foundation of all of them His moral chain was replaced by religion’s social and political power in maintaining order of the commonwealth by the publication of his Essays on the Characteristics in 1751

Religion as an Instrument
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.