Abstract

Simple SummaryCattle grazing late-season dormant rangeland are subject to impaired production due to reduced forage digestibility and a longer residence time of forage in the rumen, leading to reduced forage intake. It is a common practice to provide supplemental protein to help counteract these effects and to improve animal well-being and livestock production. Yet, the usage of supplements has been shown to interrupt and reduce the time spent grazing. These behavioral changes may vary with climate and the frequency and timing of strategic supplementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate how protein supplementation altered grazing behavior when used in both rotationally and continuously grazed dormant pastures. We utilized accelerometers (used in rockets to measure velocity in three directions and in smart phones to rotate the screen) to evaluate cattle behavior (via head movements) every 5 s on a 24 h basis. The cattle altered their grazing behavior in response to climate, supplementation status, and the grazing system. Cattle that were deprived of the protein supplement and stayed in the same continuously grazed pasture showed more restlessness in their behavior, spending more time walking from midnight to 8 a.m. Additionally, the harvest rate of dormant forage increased for the supplemented cattle.The objective was to determine if low- or high-residual feed intake (LRFI or HRFI, n = 24 for each) Hereford × Angus cows on continuously or rotationally grazed rangeland altered their grazing behavior when provided a protein supplement in late autumn. Treatments included continuously grazed, control (CCON, n = 12); continuously grazed, supplemented (CTRT, n = 12); rotationally grazed, control (RCON, n = 12); and rotationally grazed, supplemented pastures (RTRT, n = 12). Cows in each treatment had grazing time (GT), resting time (RT), and walking time (WLK) measured for 2 years with accelerometers. Bite rate (BR) was also measured. Time distributions of GT and RT differed by year (p < 0.05), being influenced by colder temperatures in 2016. Cattle in 2016 spent more time grazing during early morning and late evening (p < 0.05) and rested more during the day (p < 0.05). In 2017, cattle in the CCON treatment walked more (p < 0.05) during early morning time periods than did the CTRT cattle, indicative of search grazing. All supplemented cattle had greater BR (p < 0.05) than control cattle in 2017. Cattle with increased nutritional demands alter grazing behavior in a compensatory fashion when grazing late-season rangelands.

Highlights

  • Cows maintained on late-season rangeland in the Pacific Northwest of the USA often experience declining forage quality [1], which may fail to meet the protein requirements (7% of dry matter) necessary for adequate rumen function [2,3]

  • Intuition would suggest that cattle maintained on a rotational grazing system may have an opportunity to select a higher quality diet than cattle which stay in the same pasture for the duration of the grazing period; past research conducted or reported by scientists in several locales [5,6,7] fail to support this conclusion

  • Using specialized equipment (GrowSafe Systems, Ltd., Airdrie, AB, Canada), cattle can be compared with respect to residual feed intake (RFI), which is expressed as the difference between expected feed intake and actual feed intake [11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cows maintained on late-season rangeland in the Pacific Northwest of the USA often experience declining forage quality [1], which may fail to meet the protein requirements (7% of dry matter) necessary for adequate rumen function [2,3]. It is a common practice to supply additional protein to cattle grazing late-season rangeland. Intuition would suggest that cattle maintained on a rotational grazing system may have an opportunity to select a higher quality diet than cattle which stay in the same pasture for the duration of the grazing period; past research conducted or reported by scientists in several locales [5,6,7] fail to support this conclusion. Extensive research [8,9,10] has been performed to classify beef cattle for their overall feed efficiency.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call