Abstract

Objective To investigate the protective effect of propofol on neurological function in rats after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its possible mechanism. Methods A total of 96 SD rats were randomly divided into sham operation group, sham operation+ propofol group, TBI group and TBI + propofol group, with 24 rats in each group. The TBI model was prepared by modified Feeney method. The sham operation+ propofol group and the TBI+ propofol group were given 50 mg/kg of propofol once daily. The sham operation group and the TBI group were injected with the same amount of normal saline. Modified neurobehavioral functional scores (mNSS) were evaluated at 1, 3, 7 and 14 days after injury; dry-wet specific gravity method was used to detect brain water content in injured area; TUNEL staining was used to detect neuronal apoptosis; chemiluminescence was used to detect activity of Oxygen cluster (ROS) content; Western blot was used to determine the expressions of inositol requirement enzyme 1 (IRE-1), enhancer binding protein homolog protein (CHOP), heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and nuclear factor E2 related factor 2 (Nrf2) protein. Results Compared with the sham operation group and the sham operation + propofol group, the mNSS, brain tissue water content, apoptosis number and ROS increased at 1, 3, 7 and 14 days after TBI in the TBI group and TBI + propofol group (P<0.05). Compared with TBI group, mNSS in TBI+ propofol group decreased significantly [(9.3±1.4)points ∶(10.9±1.2)points] 7 days after injury (P<0.05); the brain tissue water content decreased significantly [(81.0±0.8)%∶(82.1±0.8)%] 3 days after injury (P<0.05); the number of apoptotic cells decreased significantly 7 days after injury[(14.1±1.4)%∶(15.6±1.6)%], with the most significant decrease at 14 days after injury [( 10.4±1.5)%∶(13.2±1.4)% (P<0.05); and ROS decreased significantly 7 days after injury [(61.5±4.0)RFU∶(77.3±5.5)RFU](P<0.05). Compared with the sham operation group and the sham operation+ propofol group, the expressions of IRE-1 and CHOP were significantly up-regulated in the TBI group and the TBI+ propofol group (P<0.05); the expressions of HO-1, NQO1 and Nrf2 in the TBI group were significantly decreased (P<0.05); the expressions of HO-1 and NQO1 in TBI+ propofol group were increased (P<0.05) while the expression of Nrf2 were decreased slightly (P<0.05). Compared with the TBI group, the expressions of IRE-1 and CHOP in TBI+ propofol group were decreased (P<0.05), while the expressions of HO-1, NQO1 and Nrf2 were significantly increased (P<0.05). Conclusion After TBI in rats, propofol can reduce oxidative stress by activating the Nrf2-antioxidant element (ARE) pathway, reduce brain edema, and inhibit neuronal apoptosis, thus playing a neuro-protective role. Key words: Brain injuries; Oxidative stress; Nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call