Abstract

In this article author had searched the questions devoted the protection of human rights in the criminal procedure legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan and comparing with the legislation and worldwide experience of the foreign states.The article reveals the ongoing liberalization of the criminal law policy in the Republic of Uzbekistan, which is aimed at expanding human and fair norms, strengthening the protection of the rights, legitimate interests of a person andsociety. Against this background, the significance of investigative actions and the theory of evidence in the country's criminal procedural legislation is being revised.
 The development of science and technology leads to the improvement of methods of committing crimes using computer technology, taking into account which the timely disclosure and effective investigation of socially dangerous acts requires extensive use of mathematical tools and computer technologies.In this regard, changes are taking place in the investigative practice aimed at increasing knowledge in the field of computer technologies among law enforcement officials and increasing the responsibility of the personal of the investigative and judicial authorities in the implementation of their activities.The author emphasizes that despite significant restrictions on the rights and legitimate interests of a person in the conduct of investigative actions, all of them are necessary for obtaining sufficient evidence to expose the guilt of the offender, in the manner prescribed by law.Compliance by investigators, prosecutors and judges of all criminal procedural requirements established by the legislation of the country is a key requirement for the recognition of evidence as lawful and sufficient for a fair sentence.It should be noted that the article highlights that, since 1994, the Criminal Procedure Code of Uzbekistan enshrines the right to defense by involving a lawyer in the case from the moment a person is detained on suspicion of committing a crime, as well as the principle of equality of arms in criminal proceedings. An addition to the liberalization of legislation is the fact that now the courts are freed from such unusual functions as the execution of court decisions.In addition, the article expands on the author's proposals for improving the legislation of Uzbekistan, as well as expanding the power of lawyers, especially in the conduct of investigative actions, aimed at expanding the process of liberalization of criminal law in the country and improving the situation with the protection of human rights in the investigation of criminal cases.

Highlights

  • After gaining theIndependence the Republic of Uzbekistan entered upon the path of formation of a democratic state governed by the rule of law and a marketeconomy country

  • The seizure and the search being the one which are investigative actions while conducted, civic rights on protection against infringement on private life and immunity of residence secured in the Article 27 of the Uzbekistan Republic Constitution and in the Article 18 of the Uzbekistan Republic code of criminal procedure have to be restricted

  • Through regular judicial reform Uzbekistan will be able to provide legitimate rights and interests of its citizens and effectively support supremacy of law by expansion of access to justice.It is notable that the process of reforming the judicial-legal is systematic, stage-by-stage and continuous process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

After gaining theIndependence the Republic of Uzbekistan entered upon the path of formation of a democratic state governed by the rule of law and a marketeconomy country. To achieve these goals Sh.Mirziyayev, the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, worked out the five guidelines for the development of the country.One of them was designated as “Supremacy of Law”, which shows respectful attitude of uzbek people to the law, justice and law and order[1]. Stereotype and attitude to investigation of crimes are being changed subject to these realities, and the main aim of which becomes not “to punish the culprit” but “protect the rights and the legitimate interests of citizens.”

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call