Abstract
Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in men globally. Early detection is critical for improving patient outcomes. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is a widely used screening tool, but its accuracy in predicting prostate cancer on transrectal biopsy remains a topic of debate. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PSA in predicting prostate cancer on transrectal biopsy. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) was conducted to identify relevant studies published between 2013 and 2024. Studies reporting the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of PSA for predicting prostate cancer on transrectal biopsy were included. Data were extracted, and the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using a random-effects model. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 1,245 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PSA for predicting prostate cancer on transrectal biopsy were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.75 - 0.82) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73), respectively. The pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 3.27 (95% CI, 2.45-4.37), 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.28), and 16.39 (95% CI, 10.27-26.21), respectively. The pooled AUC was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90). In conclusion, PSA demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy in predicting prostate cancer on transrectal biopsy. However, it is essential to consider its limitations, including false positives and negatives. Further research is needed to identify strategies to improve the accuracy of PSA testing and reduce unnecessary biopsies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.