Abstract
PurposeThe introduction of renewable materials into automotive applications is perceived as an innovative lightweight solution. Wood-based materials are advantageous in that they have potentially lower environmental impacts as compared with other materials such as steel. However, using wood per se does not automatically ensure more sustainability. Few prospective sustainability assessment methods or studies on the use of wood-based materials in automotive applications have been carried out, although these are needed to reduce unintended, negative sustainability effects and to support sustainable oriented research and innovation. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the potential sustainability effects and consequences of introducing a wood-based component into an automotive application.MethodsA combination of methods was used to analyze the potential sustainability effects when introducing wood into automotive applications. This prospective life cycle sustainability analysis solely relied on secondary data. The environmental impacts were analyzed using a simplified environmental life cycle assessment on the product level. A multi-regional input-output-based assessment was conducted to model the country-specific environmental and socioeconomic consequences. The potential shift in social risks and opportunities on a national scale was analyzed by conducting a generic social life cycle assessment. Various aspects of each approach differ, with each providing a specific perspective of the system under study.Results and discussionThe results indicate that implementing wood into automotive application can have environmental, social, and economic benefits, according to most of the indicators analyzed. Mostly due to the product weight reduction due to the use of a wood-based component, the results show that environmental impacts decrease. Some possible consequences of using wood-based materials are increased value added and increasing the number of jobs in European countries. Similarly, the social risks and opportunities are shifted from countries all over the world to European countries, which perform better than developing countries according to several indicators. However, some indicators, such as migrant acceptance or local supplier quantity, perform better in the current situation.ConclusionsThe presented case study is particularly notable, because the results clearly indicate the advantages of using wood-based materials in automotive applications, although the application of such relatively holistic and complex approaches often may lead to rather indifferent pictures. Policy makers, researchers, and companies can apply this combination of methods that rely solely on generic data to obtain both feasible and informative results. These methods also allow users to link the product level assessment with a regional and social perspective and screen critical topics to support sustainability research and innovation.
Highlights
The transition towards a bioeconomy can be described as movement to an economy where the basic components of materials, chemicals, and energy are made out of bio-based resources (McCormick and Kautto 2013)
The results of this review show that most of the automotive LCAs assessed indicators related to the Global Warming Potential (GWP) and energy (Hottle et al 2017; Mair-Bauernfeind et al 2020)
The potential environmental impacts of the side impact beam (SIB) were calculated by performing attributional LCA using ReCiPe for the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)
Summary
The transition towards a bioeconomy can be described as movement to an economy where the basic components of materials, chemicals, and energy are made out of bio-based resources (McCormick and Kautto 2013) This transition requires companies to identify new applications and markets for bio-based materials. One possible market for innovative biobased materials is the automotive sector, which is being placed under an increasing amount of legal pressure to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of their fleet (European Commission 2014). The attention of researchers and manufacturers has turned to the idea of re-introducing wood into automotive applications. This re-introduction process has been the focus of several research projects (e.g., HAMMER, NIOS, or WoodC.A.R.) (Jost et al 2018; Leitgeb et al 2016; Müller et al 2019a; Müller et al 2019b). Using wood per se does not automatically ensure more sustainability (Hesser et al 2017; Osburg et al 2016)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.