Prospective evaluation of front-line chemo-immunotherapy (C-IT) with oregovomab (2 alternative dosing schedules) carboplatin-paclitaxel (C-P) in advanced ovarian cancer (OC)

Abstract

3024 Background: Chemotherapy (C) induced bone marrow suppression has been assumed to inhibit the generation of augmented immune responses. This has limited investigation of front-line C-IT in OC. Temporal relationship of IT administration relative to C has not been established. Oregovomab is a CA125 specific MAb in development as an OC adjuvant treatment to induce tumor specific immunity. Methods: Patients (pts) awaiting staging laparotomy for presumptive OC were consented to the study and contributed primary tumor samples. Qualifying pts were subsequently randomized to concurrent C-IT with antibody administered at cycles 1, 3, and 5 (Arm A) or 8 ± 2 days following cycles 1, 3, and 5 (Arm B) of standard C-P. Both arms received additional infusions of oregovomab every 12 weeks until progression; response to C-IT was assessed at 36 weeks. Results: Forty stage III/IV pts (18 Arm A; 22 Arm B) were randomized and dosed. More pts in Arm A (39%) were stage IV vs Arm B (14%) however 27% of Arm B pts had >2cm residual disease vs. 11% in Arm A. Complete clinical response (CR) to surgery and C-IT was achieved in 15 pts (83%) in Arm A and 17 pts (77%) in Arm B. For pts with = 2 cm residual disease, 88% in Arm A had = 65 U/mL CA125 prior to/at cycle 3, normalized CA125 and a CR post C-IT compared to 75% of pts in Arm B. Robust Ab2 antibody response (>100 ng/mL) was achieved in 94% of Arm A and 68% of Arm B pts. The immune response developed earlier in Arm A. After one injection of oregovomab, 31% of pts in Arm A vs. 0% in Arm B generated HAMA > 3000 ng/mL and Ab2 > 100 ng/mL (P=0.016 Fisher’s Exact Test). Such an early and vigorous response pattern has not been seen in previous oregovomab studies which have not included concomitant front-line C. There were no IT related serious adverse events. Conclusions: Contrary to expectations, concurrent C-P resulted in enhanced immune stimulation with oregovomab. Interestingly, concurrent infusion of oregovomab was more immunogenic than delayed infusion. Clinical activity was favorable and safety profiles were similar to that expected for C alone. Further randomized evaluation of front-line CP-oregovomab vs CP is warranted. [Table: see text]