Abstract

The potential environmental impacts of producing and using future electric vehicles (EVs) are important given their expected role in mitigating global climate change and local air pollutants. Recently, studies have begun assessing the effect of potential future changes in EVs supply chains on overall environmental performance. This study contributes by integrating expected changes in future energy, iron, and steel production in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of EVs. In this light, the study examines the impacts of changes in these parameters on producing and charging future EVs. Future battery electric vehicles (BEV) could have a 36–53% lower global warming potential (GWP) compared to current BEV. The change in source of electricity generation accounts for 89% of GWP reductions over the BEV’s life cycle. Thus, it presents the highest GWP reduction potential of 35–48%. The use of hydrogen for direct reduction of iron in steelmaking (HDR-I) is expected to reduce vehicle production GWP by 17% compared to current technology. By accounting for 9% of the life cycle GWP reductions, HDR-I has the second-highest reduction potential (1.3–4.8%). The results also show that the potential for energy efficiency improvement measures for GWP reduction in vehicle and battery manufacture would be more beneficial when applied now than in the distant future (2050), when the CO2 intensity of the EU electricity is expected to be lower. Interestingly, under the same conditions, the high share of renewable energy in vehicle supply chains contributed to a decrease in all air pollution-related impact categories, but an increase in toxicity-related categories, as well as land use and water consumption.

Highlights

  • Passenger car transport is fundamentally changing, with vehicle electrification, connectivity, and automation among the leading technical evolutions [1]

  • The results of the prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) for the three vehicles and the production impact according to changes in iron and steel and energy production based on the reference case and two future scenarios, ModRES and HighRES, are shown here

  • It was found that in the reference case, the battery electric vehicles (BEV), PHEV and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV) had a global warming potential (GWP) of 170 g CO2 eq/km, 221 g CO2 eq/km, and 257 g CO2 eq/km respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Passenger car transport is fundamentally changing, with vehicle electrification, connectivity, and automation among the leading technical evolutions [1]. Among these changes, vehicle electrification is mainly driven by the need to decarbonise the transport sector and reduce its contribution to global warming and air pollution [2,3]. The transport sector is responsible for 25% of global energy-related. In 2012 alone, the sector consumed about 28% of the global final energy demand, of which light-duty passenger vehicles consumed almost half (13%) [5]. Fossil fuel remains the main source of primary energy for the transport sector [6]. The use of currently dominant transport technologies in the future will only increase the sector’s contribution to climate change and fossil resource depletion [2,3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call