Abstract

ObjectiveVincristine is a mainstay treatment for paediatric cancers, particularly acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), with common toxicity including vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN). The present study comprehensively assessed VIPN outcomes in patients receiving vincristine treatment for ALL. MethodsChildren diagnosed with ALL commencing vincristine treatment were prospectively evaluated (baseline, post-induction, pre-reinduction, post-reinduction, follow-up). VIPN was examined clinically using the Balis sensory/motor scale, neurophysiologically using axonal excitability techniques and quality-of-life using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. ResultsThirty-one patients were recruited to this study (age = 6.8 ± 4.4; 61.3% female). Incidence of motor VIPN (motor Balis grade > 0) symptoms were higher than sensory VIPN (sensory Balis grade > 0) at post-induction (92.0% vs 36.0%) and post-reinduction (81.8% vs 22.7%) vincristine treatment. Neurophysiological assessment also demonstrated greater change in motor axonal excitability parameters compared to sensory parameters including changes in depolarising threshold electrotonus (P < 0.0125), superexcitability and subexcitability parameters (all P < 0.0125). Follow-up assessment demonstrated persisting VIPN symptoms with reduced quality-of-life scores compared to baseline. ConclusionsClinical and neurophysiological evaluation of VIPN suggests vincristine produces a motor-prominent sensorimotor neuropathy in children which persisted at follow-up. SignificanceVIPN signs and symptoms develop early in the treatment course, in line with axonal excitability profiles. Early detection of significant nerve changes may support timely implementation of neuroprotection strategies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call