Abstract

Decision-making is in the service of action regardless of whether the decision concerns perceptual information, goods or memories. Compared to recent advances in the neurobiology of perceptual or value-based decisions, however, the neural bases supporting the sampling of evidence in long-term memory, and the transformation of memory-based decisions into appropriate actions, are still poorly understood. In the present fMRI study, we used multivariate pattern analysis to investigate the temporal dynamics of choice- and action-predictive signals during an item recognition task that manipulated the association between memory choices (old/new) and motor responses (eye/hand) across subjects. Choice-predictive activity was mainly observed in striatal, lateral prefrontal and lateral parietal regions, was sensitive to the amount of decision evidence and showed a rapid increase after stimulus onset, followed by a fast decay. Action-predictive signals were found in primary sensory motor, premotor and occipito–parietal regions, were generally observed at the end of the decision phase and were not modulated by decision evidence. These findings suggest that a memory decision variable, potentially represented in a fronto–striato–parietal network, is not directly transformed into an action plan as often observed in perceptual decisions. Regions exhibiting choice predictive activity, and especially the striatum, however, also showed a second peak of decision-related activity that, unlike pure choice- or action-predictive signals, depended on the particular choice–response association. This second peak of activity in the striatum might represent the neural signature of the transformation of a memory decision into an appropriate motor response based on the specific choice–response association.

Highlights

  • Decision-making involves the evaluation of evidence for a particular choice and the selection of an appropriate action (Kable and Glimcher 2009; Shadlen and Shohamy 2016)

  • A three-way ANOVA with memory status and evidence as the within-subject factors and choice–response association (A1, A2) as the betweensubject factor was conducted to test whether item recognition performance significantly increased as a function of decision evidence

  • We examined the relationship between signals associated with memory decisions and motor intentions in the human brain

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decision-making involves the evaluation of evidence for a particular choice and the selection of an appropriate action (Kable and Glimcher 2009; Shadlen and Shohamy 2016). While the resonance between features of the probe and items within the set represents evidence for old decisions, new decisions are made when the search for relatedness terminates in a non-match (Ratcliff 1978) Consistent with this model, we have subsequently identified BOLD signals compatible with the representation of a decision variable during item recognition (Sestieri et al 2014) and source memory (Guidotti et al 2019) decisions in regions located within or adjacent to the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). We compared the temporal profile of decoding accuracy of a within- and a betweensubject analysis to investigate potential neural mechanisms underlying the transformation of a memory decision into an appropriate response based on the specific choice–response association

Methods
Participants
Procedure
Results
Discussion
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.