Abstract
This study analyzed the food security situation among cassava-based farming households in Akpabuyo local government area of Cross River state, Nigeria. The objectives were to describe their socio – economic characteristics, determine their food security status and its determinants and make recommendation based on the findings of the study. A multi-stage sampling procedure was used in the selection of wards, communities and cassava-based farming households. Data for the study were collected through the use of structured questionnaires administered to one hundred and three (103) households from 53 communities in the Local Government area. Descriptive statistics, food security indices and logistic regression models were used in data analysis and interpretation. The results showed that the percentages of male to female farmers differed considerably, with most households (59%) consisting of married men and women, thirty three percent (33%) of which were aged 46 years and above. Ninety eight percent (98%) of the households were comprised mostly of Christians, thirty-eight percent (38%) of whom had no formal education. Forty eight percent (48%) of the total number of the cassava farming households had less than 4 member-family sizes. The results showed also that 63.11% of the farming households were food secure, while 36.89% were food insecure. The food security gap and food surplus index showed that the food-secure households exceeded the food security line by 33%, while 59% of food-insecure household fell below the food security line. Also, the mean per capita expenditure for all households was N12, 684.21 while the mean per capita expenditure for food secure and food insecure households were N9000 and N3684.20 respectively. The estimated regression model gave a pseudo of 0.7304. Food security and Poverty status of the households were negatively correlated. The odd ratio in favour of household food security decreased by 0.03% for every unit increase in poverty (P>0.05%). It is recommended that more of the young and energetic youth population, and more women and the vulnerable be encouraged to engage themselves more in cassava and other crops’ enterprises; that household sizes be controlled to manageable numbers, and sizes of their farm lands optimally expanded. Finally, sources of farmers’ income should be diversified and cassava farmers should be encouraged to form and/or join cooperative societies so as to build and benefit from ensuing “social capital”, as well as be in positions to benefit from possible incentives of government(s).
Highlights
Poverty is one of the greatest challenges facing the world today and it remains one of the unfinished tasks of this century
Majority of the cassavabased households were males who pooled 59% of the total, with women occupying the remaining 41% of their population. This result is rather surprising because in Africa and in Nigeria, cassava is socioculturally presumed to be a woman’s crop, while yam – generally regarded as king of all crops is in turn presumed to be a man’s crop; but the reasons for this discrepancy are not far-fetched
Based on the results above, it is evident that the poverty situation and food security status of cassavabased farming households in Akpabuyo local government area of Cross River state were and still are heavily dependent upon the socio-economic characteristics of the cassava-based farming households
Summary
Poverty is one of the greatest challenges facing the world today and it remains one of the unfinished tasks of this century Though it has been described in several ways as “the lack of certain capabilities such as not being able to participate with dignity in the society” (Sen,1989); “a living condition in which an entity is faced with economic, social, political, cultural and environmental deprivations laced with vulnerability and powerlessness” (Lipton and Ravallion, 1995; Sen, 2000), its greatest meaning comes when it is seen “as the inability of any individual or a family to command sufficient resources to satisfy basic needs, the threshold level of income needed to satisfy basic minimum food and non-food requirements. Each country has primary responsibility for its own economic and social development and the role of national policies, domestic resources and development strategies cannot be overemphasized
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.