Abstract
The fatigue of fast-twitch, glycolytic mammalian motor units [i.e., type FF; nomenclature of (3)] is dependent, in part, on the stimulation regimen (total number of stimuli, frequency, duty cycle, temporal patterning of stimuli, etc.) used to induce fatigue. To study the effect of the temporal pattern of the stimulus train on the rate and extend of fatigue in single FF units, one theoretically acceptable approach would be to use each motor unit as its own control: i.e., a sequential testing with two fatigue tests that differ only in the temporal organization of their stimuli. The purpose of this communication is to provide evidence that such an approach is not feasible when studying FF units, due to the delayed recovery of force following their repetitive activation. It was shown that 1/s activation of single FF units for only 15 or 45 s with intermittent 40-Hz, 300-ms duration trains significantly reduced their force response to a double-pulse shock for several hours. This finding suggests that in studies designed to test for the effects of different stimulation patterns on the fatigue of single motor units, deeply anaesthetized, reduced animal preparations are not appropriate models for the sequential application of different stimulation regimens to fast-twitch, glycolytic, mammalian motor units.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
