Abstract

Abstract. Ten year simulations of North American current and future air-quality were carried out using a regional air-quality model driven by a regional climate model, in turn driven by a general circulation model. Three separate summer scenarios were performed: a scenario representing the years 1997 to 2006, and two SRES A2 climate scenarios for the years 2041 to 2050. The first future climate scenario makes use of 2002 anthropogenic precursor emissions, and the second applied emissions scaling factors derived from the IPCC Representative Concentration Pathway 6 (RCP 6) scenario to estimate emissions for 2050 from existing 2020 projections. Ten-year averages of ozone and PM2.5 at North American monitoring network stations were used to evaluate the model's current chemical climatology. The model was found to have a similar performance for ozone as when driven by an operational weather forecast model. The PM2.5 predictions had larger negative biases, likely resulting from the absence of rainwater evaporation, and from sub-regional negative biases in the surface temperature fields, in the version of the climate model used here. The differences between the two future climate simulations and the current climate simulation were used to predict the changes to air-quality that might be expected in a future warmer climate, if anthropogenic precursor emissions remain constant at their current levels, versus if the RCP 6 emissions controls were adopted. Metrics of concentration, human health, and ecosystem damage were compared for the simulations. The scenario with future climate and current anthropogenic emissions resulted in worse air-quality than for current conditions – that is, the effect of climate-change alone, all other factors being similar, would be a worsening of air-quality. These effects are spatially inhomogeneous, with the magnitude and sign of the changes varying with region. The scenario with future climate and RCP 6 emissions for 2050 resulted in an improved air-quality, with decreases in key pollutant concentrations, in acute human mortality associated with air-pollution, and in sulphur and ozone deposition to the ecosystem. The positive outcomes of the RCP 6 emissions reductions were found to be of greater magnitude than the negative outcomes of climate change alone. The RCP 6 scenario however resulted in an increase in the deposition of nitrogen, as a result of increased ammonia emissions expected in that scenario, compared to current ammonia emissions levels. The results of the study raise the possibility that simultaneous reductions of greenhouse gases and air pollution precursors may further reduce air pollution levels, with the added benefits of an immediate reduction in the impacts of air pollution on human and ecosystem health. Further scenarios to investigate this possibility are therefore recommended.

Highlights

  • Global climate change occurs through changes in the balance of incoming and outgoing radiation in the complete climate system, and may manifest itself as alterations in the mean and statistical distribution of meteorological parameters such as temperature, wind speed and direction, humidity, and precipitation at the regional and local scale (IPCC, 2007)

  • The global climate change projection was provided by the CGCM and dynamically downscaled to the higher resolution required for the regional Chemical Transport Models (CTMs) using the CRCM

  • The analysis shows that a much more significant impact on air-quality would occur with the enactment of Representative Concentration Pathway 6 (RCP 6) emissions reductions: O3 and PM2.5 levels would decrease over much of North America, and the average OH concentration of the atmosphere would decrease

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global climate change occurs through changes in the balance of incoming and outgoing radiation in the complete climate system, and may manifest itself as alterations in the mean and statistical distribution of meteorological parameters such as temperature, wind speed and direction, humidity, and precipitation at the regional and local scale (IPCC, 2007). In addition to interannual variability and the specifics of projected changes in physical climate at the regional scale, the effects of model resolution, boundary conditions, and chemical mechanisms as all contribute to the spread in projected changes in ozone (Avise et al, 2009; Racherla and Adams, 2008; Wu et al, 2008b; Forkel and Knoche, 2007). Despite these variations, the general consensus indicates that the eastern US and parts of Europe will see an increase in the md8hrO3 under the IPCC A and B scenarios (IPCC, 2007). These factors give rise to uncertainty in the projections presented below and argue for the use of multi-model ensembles of projections (US EPA, 2009)

Methodology
AURAMS
Scenarios
Model performance
Model predictions: air-quality changes
Sulphur and nitrogen deposition
Ozone deposition
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call