Abstract
In 1986, Dinwiddy and Teal analyzed the shadow exchange rate (SER) in a tariff-distorted, small economy containing two traded and one non-traded good. Contrary to their claim, I maintain a SER is inherent to their model even if the balance of payments constraint is binding. It equals the value of the marginal consumption basket at market prices divided by its value at world or foreign exchange equivalent (FEE) prices. Shadow prices defined in welfare terms equal the products of the SER and (1) the world (or FEE) prices of goods, or (2) marginal products of factors at world prices. Copyright 1990 by The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
