Abstract

Research conducted during the late 1970s and 1980s suggested that one reason greater progress was not being made in achieving a fully representative federal bureaucracy was that federal supervisors, who make hiring and promotion decisions on a day-to-day basis, did not support increasing workforce diversity. This paper updates and expands those findings by examining supervisors' responses to a recent governmentwide survey. It then examines the extent to which such attitudes have an impact on supervisors' efforts to hire Hispanics when they are aware that Hispanics are under-represented in their own work unit. Survey responses suggest that there is not widespread support for the concept of representative bureaucracy and that such attitudes may have an impact on their recruitment efforts. What is of more consequence in their recruitment activity, however, is their own race/national origin.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.