Programmed electrical stimulation after myocardial infarction and reperfusion in conscious dogs

Abstract

The hemodynamic and electrophysiologic variables and the inducibility of arrhythmias were studied before coronary artery occlusion (CAO, 4h) and on days 4, 14, and 28 of the late reperfusion phase in conscious, chronically instrumented dogs. Despite a lack of significant changes in the hemodynamic and the electrophysiologic variables, the response to programmed electrical stimulation (PES) before and after CAO with subsequent reperfusion varied substantially. Before intervention arrhythmias such as sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT) or ventricular fibrillation (VFib) could not be induced by PES via ultrasonic crystals located subendocardially (LAD and LCX region) or via common stimulation electrodes (right ventricle) in any of six instrumented animals. All six animals were inducible after CAO and reperfusion. Five animals showed SVT and one animal showed VFib in response to stimulation on days 4 and 14 of the late reperfusion phase after CAO. On day 28 four animals showed SVT, and two showed VFib. Antiarrhythmic drug testing carried out in the late reperfusion phase with lidocaine (1 mg/kg bolus followed by continuous infusion) revealed 50% efficacy at a dosage of 40 μg/kg/min, 100% at 80 μg/kg/min, and 67% at 120 μ/kg/min. The persistent inducibility of arrhythmias for the entire experimental period of 24 days may be attributable to the following features of our model: 1. 1. Electrical stimulation carried out from three different locations. 2. 2. The use of up to three extrastimuli in the PES studies. 3. 3. The use of conscious dogs during CAO, reperfusion, and PES. This novel experimental approach thus promises to be of clinical relevance for the investigation of new antiarrhythmic drugs.