Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to shed some lights on the process of mission drifting or abandoning poverty objective by Islamic microfinance institutions (IMFs). The paper investigates whether the extensive use of banking logic changes IMFs, from focusing on both development and financial objectives to only considering sustainability as their primary mission.Design/methodology/approachThis paper adopts mixed methods by analyzing 7,200 microfinance data from Microfinance Exchange Market and reviewing annual reports and websites of 25 IMFs to examine their vision and mission statements and other related information.FindingsThe finding shows Islamic microfinance has not changed, despite increasing adoption of financial or banking performance measures. However, size and age of the institutions may affect the outcome in the future. The authors find that smaller microfinance institutions maintain genuine objective to serve the poor, as the grow larger they would be more inclined toward sustainability objectives.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is limited on the sample size as data on Islamic microfinance globally is limited. However, the paper looked at the global data rather than local data to compensate for this limitation. Future study would be further taking the study through qualitative methods to support the study.Originality/valueThis paper aims to shed some lights on the process of mission drifting or abandoning poverty objective by IMFIs. The paper investigates how has the extensive use of financing logic has changed IMFIs from focusing on both development and financial objectives to only considering sustainability as their primary mission. Arun and Hulme (2009) argued that the interaction of multiple logic within microfinance institutions, i.e. financial vs social, could pose some serious management dilemmas within microfinance institutions. Further, commercialization puts pressure on the field staffs to achieve financial targets and often neglect their poverty outreach mission to the poor. The well-known crisis in Andhra Pradesh, India where clients of microfinance institutions committed suicide after being shamed by field officers who tried to collect payments of loans (Mader, 2013; Taylor, 2011), provides a powerful case of the impact of financialization to microfinance clients.

Highlights

  • Islamic microfinance sector is an important area of research to find evidence that poverty alleviation can be effectively addressed

  • After analyzing regression results as well as visions and mission of select IMFIs, the study finds that there is no strong evident to suggest that Islamic microfinance has abandoned poverty mission

  • Most of the IMFIs are adopting dual missions or poverty alleviation and attaining sustainability, they remain committed to their original mission of helping the poor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Islamic microfinance sector is an important area of research to find evidence that poverty alleviation can be effectively addressed. Market failure assumption seems to hold even in the Islamic banking sector, which for many is considered as a different breed of financial institution. Market failure is one of the triggers for the birth of microfinance movement (Armendariz and Morduch, 2005). They argue that market failure theory is the main driver in the development of microfinance, i.e. the failure of banks to reach out poor families or microenterprises who are in need of capital. The success of Grameen Bank, BancoSol, Bank Rakyat Indonesia Unit Desa, Accion, Sewa and many other pioneers in microfinance, complemented poverty reduction programs of respective Governments in Bangladesh, Bolivia, Indonesia and India

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call