Professionalism and Authority: Women in Public Service

Abstract

necessary, however, to define a complex model of all causal relationships in order to conduct an evaluation. Hatry, et al., suggest that other influences on the criteria should be considered in the normal course of identifying the positive and negative impacts of a specific program or set of activities. See Harry Hatry, Richard Winnie, and Donald M. Fisk, Practical Program Evaluation for State and Local Government Officials (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 1973). 20. For a discussion of factors associated with absenteeism and turnover see Lyman W. Porter and Richard M. Steers, Organizational, Work, and Personal Factors in Employee Turnover and Absenteeism, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 80 (1973), pp. 151-176. 21. Barry A. Macy and Philip M. Mirvis, A Methodology for Assessment of Quality of Work Life and Organizational Effectiveness in Behavioral-Economic Terms, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2 (June, 1976), pp. 212-226. 22. Stanley Seashore, B. Indik, and B. Georgopoulos, Relationships Among Criteria of Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 44 (1960), pp. 195-202. 23. We view adaptability as an integral part of what Walton and McKersie term integrative bargaining or joint problem-solving. See Walton and McKersie, op. cit. 24 See Edward E. Lawler, III, Motivation in Work Organizations (Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., 1973). 25. Campbell, et al., op. cit., p. 80. 26. Raymond A. Katzell and Daniel Yankelovitch, Work, Productivity and Job Satisfaction: An Evaluation of Policy-Related Research. Final report to the National Science Foundation, No. SSH 73-07939, 1975.