Abstract
This paper examines how norms are introduced and implemented in the production and trade of medicines in China and Australia. Through a discussion of the status of the pharmaceutical profession in these two countries, it argues that in China the propagation of professional standards and the control over their implementation are exclusively a matter for external sanctions, while in Australia the validity of a pharmacists’ professional code reduces the need for external supervision. The paper further investigates the systemic and institutional reasons for this difference. Key words : Professional codes; Ethics; Pharmacists; Medicines
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
