Productivity, fuel consumption and cost in whole tree cable yarding: conventional diesel carriage versus electrical energy-recuperating carriage

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cable yarding is an inherently expensive extraction technology, but the mainstay for mountain forest management. Fuel cost represents a considerable share of total harvesting costs. Energy-recuperating, electrical slack-pulling carriages (EC), which recuperate energy during lateral yarding and store it as electrical energy in super-capacitors for powering slack-pulling during the subsequent yarding cycle have emerged only recently. Fuel consumption of cable yarding is expected to be lower when ECs are employed compared to working with conventional, diesel engine-powered slack-pulling drive (DC) carriages. To determine if reality matched expectations, a time and motion study was conductedduring which fuel consumption was extracted from the engine control systems using custom-made dataloggers for an uphill whole tree yarding operation in Austria. Average productivity was 21.9 m3 per productive system hour excluding delays (m3 PSH0 −1) at 0.89 m3 average tree volume and 58.4 m average yarding distance. Productivity was modeled as a function of average tree volume, yarding distance and lateral yarding distance. Average fuel consumption was 1.27 ± 0.97 l m−3 (DC) and 0.88 ± 0.56 l m−3 (EC). In the DC treatment, the carriage engine accounted for 9% of the total fuel consumption. Modeling revealed that fuel consumption depended on average tree volume, yarding distance, lateral yarding distance and carriage type as originally postulated. The latter effect interacted with that of average tree volume and EC’s advantage in fuel consumption was limited by a break-even average tree volume. In conclusion, the EC has the potential to improve profit margins in small-tree operations through lower fuel consumption.