Abstract
The development of wireless communication and artificial intelligence decision-making has allowed our scientific research to be carried out on a more convenient and precise basis. This kind of all-round progress is also very obvious in the field of linguistic research. The research presented to explain the observation that people may use one of the alternate clauses to describe the picture they see. This linguistic observation leads us to the assumption that there may exist a functional cortex connecting visual information of an event with a group of corresponding clauses. Between the visual information and a group of clauses can be understood as a shared conceptual content of both. It is well supported by the PET and the ERP experiments. In other words, if a group of alternate clauses are connected with the same visual information, they are said to have the same conceptual content. In our linguistic model, this shared conceptual content is represented as a conceptual frame. In most linguistic studies, however, alternate syntactic structures are said to be derived from different meanings of the same verb via different argument structures. The difference between the conceptual frame and its corresponding argument structures needs more substantial evidence from brain imaging for the plausibility of conceptual frame. To answer this question, we attempt to investigate the relationship between a group of alternate clauses and two different pictures via priming effect manifested by an ERP component. Also, we make full use of wireless communication and artificial intelligence decision-making technology to construct. This technical background allows this research to fully simulate the practical environment while also making more assumptions about uncertainty. In the clause-picture priming experiment, clauses are treated as prime stimuli, designated as S1. The pictures are treated as target stimuli, designated as S2. One picture is conceptually congruent with all the clauses, and the other is not. The ERP component N270 is expected to be sensitive to the degree to which the S2 (the target stimulus) is in agreement with S1 (stimulus). After many simulation experiments, the experimental framework of wireless communication and artificial intelligence decision-making technology architecture provides a lot of reference data for research. The results of the experiment show that the semantics of each individual clause of an event was consistent with the semantics of its following congruent picture but inconsistent with that of the incongruent picture. Therefore, each clause of an event, though has different grammatical structures, shares the same semantics. This shared semantics is understood as the conceptual frame.
Highlights
MethodsTheoretical background Theoretical framework Research objectives Introduction to theoretical research
Picture-picture information conflict could elicit an N270, and on the other hand, visual semantic processing of pictures is similar with verbal semantic processing (Pratarelli, 1994; Vandenberghe, 1996). erefore, we assumed if a group of alternate clauses, though classified as different argument structures, have the same conceptual content or conceptual frame as we propose, the eventrelated potential (ERP) component of the primed target picture may be sensitive to the congruency
None of them systematically explore the conceptual meaning associated with the form-semantic relationship. e rise of contemporary wireless communication and AI decision-making technologies presents a great opportunity for us to integrate the advantages of various experimental models
Summary
Theoretical background Theoretical framework Research objectives Introduction to theoretical research. S2 was presented until the participants pressed the key to make a choice on whether the picture was congruent or incongruent with the previous sentence. After the response, another blank for 400 ms was presented. E factors were conditions with two levels (related and unrelated) and clauses with four levels (four clauses in each event). To observe the different effects of congruent and incongruent S2, we obtained two different waves: wave of Condition 1 (congruent) and wave of Condition 2 (incongruent).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
