Processing capacity then, relevance now: In response to Pulos

Abstract

Journal of Research in Science TeachingVolume 30, Issue 2 p. 215-217 Comments and CriticsmFree Access Processing capacity then, relevance now: In response to Pulos Wolff-Michael Roth, Wolff-Michael RothSearch for more papers by this author Wolff-Michael Roth, Wolff-Michael RothSearch for more papers by this author First published: February 1993 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300209AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. Orlando: Academic Press. Case, R., & Globerson, T. (1974). Field dependence and central computing space. Child Development, 45, 772– 778. Collis, K. F., & Romberg, T. A. (1979). The assessment of children's M-space (Tech. Rep. No. 1). Madison: University of Wisconsin Graduate School, Research and Development Center. Daneman, M. (1982). The measuring of reading comprehension: How not to trade construct validity for predictive power. Intelligence 6, 331– 345. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450– 466. Glanzer, M., Dorfman, D., & Kaplan, B. (1981). Short-term storage in the processing of text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 656– 670. Lawson, A. E. (1983). Predicting science achievement: The role of developmental level, disembedding ability, mental capacity, prior knowledge, and beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(2), 117– 129. Mitchell, A., & Lawson, A. E. (1988). Predicting genetics achievement in nonmajor college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(1), 23– 37. Niaz, M. (1988). Manipulation of M-demand of chemistry problems and its effect on student performance: A neo-Piagetian study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 643– 657. Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301– 345. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction ( 2nd ed.). New York: CBS College Publishing. Roth, W.-M. (1990). Neo-Piagetian predictors of achievement in physical science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (6), 509– 521. Roth, W.-M. (1992). Comments to the “Methodological limitations for the use of expert systems techniques in science education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (6), 629– 632. Roth, W.-M., & Milkent, M. M. (1991). Factors in the development of proportional reasoning strategies in concrete operational college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(6), 553– 566. Volume30, Issue2February 1993Pages 215-217 ReferencesRelatedInformation