Abstract

A market system does not automatically lead to an optimum allocation of public goods. Market-based exchange will always lead to a deficit of a public good compared with the socially optimal level. We argue that public goods in each sector of the economy constitute an isomorphic, socioeconomic system that is not a “black box.” Thus, in order to determine the deficit of public goods, it is first necessary to investigate the available quantities versus the quality of those goods, because their performance is not only a function of public spending. There is no generally accepted methodology for doing this and there are no universal methods for quantifying public goods. The aim of this work is to develop a universal methodology for the quantification of public goods in ordinal categories, taking into account both the amount and quality of a good and budgetary valuing. In the empirical part, the authors identify various models (assets structures) of healthcare financing, using a set of OECD countries as an example. The authors also investigate to what extent these models influence the value of public goods in that sector. Composite measures have been computed for both the amount and quality of public goods. Subsequently, an agglomerative cluster analysis and a multifactorial analysis of variance are performed. Although the studied systems are diverse and reflect different social choices, the analyses show that the effectiveness of a healthcare system depends not only on the level of public financing, but also on its structure.

Highlights

  • The quantification of public goods is among the most complex problems in the theory of public choice

  • The methodological proposal is the research procedure serving to make a quantification of public goods by determining their amount, quality and efficiency, followed by identification of the financial determinants of value so defined

  • It should be noted that the above methodology is fairly universal, that is, it can be used to analyse the process of creation of public goods in various sectors of the economy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The quantification of public goods is among the most complex problems in the theory of public choice. Few such goods exist in the economy (examples may include national defence, law and order, and security) We extend this definition to include socalled merit goods, which from a physical standpoint might be private goods, but as a result of social doctrine and of the social policy implemented by the public authorities, are supplied to a citizen even when he or she does not accept that fact. They include most of the goods financed by the public sector, in the fields of education and healthcare, and, in accordance with the latest concepts, in agriculture

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call