Problems of legal education in contemporary Russia

Victor Linkin,Galina Pulenko,Zinaida Lusegenova,D Rudoy,N Ugrekhelidze,A Olshevskaya

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202127312100

Abstract

The authors set a goal to analyze the problems of contemporary legal education in Russia in the presented research. The necessity of legal education in interdisciplinary and cross-sector interaction with other humanities are identified, and only when these connections are established, it is possible to get into inter-scientific relations. The most extreme issues of the activities of law faculties in various types of educational institutions - in departmental and multidisciplinary institutions were considered, using the example of the influence of various approaches to training future employees of the judiciary. The influence of the educational institution affiliation on the educational process and the issues of deployment the teaching staff are considered, the differences in teaching practical skills in these types of educational institutions are also demonstrated. The authors identified two types of problems - internal and external. Internal - the problems of the educational institutions themselves, external - the problems of implementing the educational policy of the state. Unfortunately, the authors state the unwillingness of the teachers themselves to change because of the rapidly modifying social relations. The absence of a critical attitude, first of all to oneself, causes a false illusion of normality and acceptability. Resulting from the analysis of the entity of the problems, the necessity of initiating changes from the educational institutions and teachers is understood, and not from the state.

Highlights

Legal education is of particular importance, since it directly determines the attitude towards society, the state, law, legal and other social regulators
A other firm economy that enhances the common good and not exclusively private benefit means a transition from Western individualism to a model of solidarization of life
Daniel Goldsworthy's 2017 work the future of legal education in the 21st century emphasizes that the number of skill-based professional tasks that will be performed by machines will continue to grow, and lawyers will be relieved of many other process-related tasks that currently consume their time and energy

Summary

Introduction

Legal education is of particular importance, since it directly determines the attitude towards society, the state, law, legal and other social regulators. Several rules-principles are proposed: - the use of information technology exclusively for communication between people; - interest in education, active employment of the ability of each student to learn for himself; - the predominance of the value nature of education, respect for cultural differences, an emphasis on the well-being of everyone in the whole world; - gaining knowledge about the interdependence of systems and sustainable development; the transition from systemic (analytical) mentality to integral one, which ensures the achievement of a true understanding of reality; - pluralism of content, without promoting specific schools and ideas, cultural diversity with all contradictions and complementarity, as a source of social evolution [1]. A third “hidden” function — outreach — is increasingly emerging as law schools invest in the dissemination of legal knowledge and skills [8]

Methods

Discussion

Conclusion